Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Transnational human rights mobilization targeting Kenya and Uganda during the 1970s and 1980s empowered domestic allies and delegitimized authoritarian regimes. This mobilization effectively challenged repressive regimes and created the basis for fundamental regime change in Uganda and significant political reforms in Kenya. But challenging authoritarian rule is only the beginning of a process aimed at creating sustainable democratic institutions. As the domestic struggle for democratic reforms progresses, the effects of transnational activism change. Targeted governments adapt quickly to the tastes of international human rights groups and devise strategies of deception and counter-mobilization. While previous strategies of conventional, state-led repression were not entirely dropped, new and more subtle efforts of harassment and threats take a prominent place. This chapter also shows how and why transnational mobilization beyond the initiation of regime change has more ambiguous and often negative effects on the political opposition.]
Published: Nov 9, 2015
Keywords: Civil Society; Opposition Parti; Donor Community; Constitutional Reform; Transnational Activism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.