Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Lee, Yu-Ri Kim, Lyeong Ye, Eul-Rae Lee (2009)
The Analysis of Suspended Sediment Load of Donghyang and Cheoncheon Basin using GIS-based SWAT Model, 12
C. Yang (1973)
Incipient Motion and Sediment TransportJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 99
Empirical relationships on the transporting capacity of overland flow. Transport and Deposition Processes
CT Yang (1973)
Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 99(HYI0)
T Sayama (2003)
Evaluation of reliability and complexity of rainfall-sediment-runoff models. Master?s Thesis, Kyoto University.
(2012)
National Soil Erosion Research Report in Korea
K. Oost, Gerard Govers, O. Cerdan, D. Thauré, A. Rompaey, A. Steegen, J. Nachtergaele, I. Takken, J. Poesen (2005)
Spatially distributed data for erosion model calibration and validation: The Ganspoel and Kinderveld datasetsCatena, 61
R. Morgan, J. Quinton, R. Smith, Gerard Govers, J. Poesen, K. Auerswald, G. Chisci, D. Torri, M. Styczen (1998)
The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23
HV Gupta, KJ Beven, T Wagener (2005)
Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences 3, John Wiley and Sons, New York
Giha Lee, Wansik Yu, Kwansue Jung, Apip (2013)
Catchment-scale soil erosion and sediment yield simulation using a spatially distributed erosion modelEnvironmental Earth Sciences, 70
H. Moradkhani, K. Hsu, H. Gupta, S. Sorooshian (2005)
Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filterWater Resources Research, 41
C. Yang (1972)
Unit Stream Power and Sediment TransportJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 98
Yuqiong Liu, A. Weerts, M. Clark, H. Franssen, Sujay Kumar, H. Moradkhani, D. Seo, D. Schwanenberg, Peter Smith, A. Dijk, N. Velzen, M. He, Haksu Lee, S. Noh, O. Rakovec, P. Restrepo (2012)
Advancing data assimilation in operational hydrologic forecasting: progresses, challenges, and emerging opportunitiesHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16
(1978)
Predicting rainfall erosion losses
Y Tachikawa, G Nagatani, K Takara (2004)
Development of stage-discharge relationship equation incorporating saturated-unsaturated flow mechanismAnnual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, 48
C Saavedra (2005)
Estimating spatial patterns of soil erosion and deposition in the Andean region using geo-information techniques: a case study in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Wageningen Universiteit.
M. Sivapalan, J. Kalma (1995)
Scale problems in hydrology: Contributions of the robertson workshopHydrological Processes, 9
(2008)
Watershed hydrological modeling based on runoff and sediment transport processes : a physically - based distributed model and its lumping
B Ristic, S Arulampalam, N Gordon (2004)
ArtechHouse
Giha Lee, Y. Tachikawa, K. Takara (2009)
Interaction between Topographic and Process Parameters due to the Spatial Resolution of DEMs in Distributed Rainfall-Runoff ModelingJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14
R. Brazier, K. Beven, S. Anthony, J. Rowan (2001)
Implications of model uncertainty for the mapping of hillslope‐scale soil erosion predictionsEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26
K. Beven (2006)
Rainfall‐Runoff Modeling: Introduction
E. Schultz, C. Mannaerts (2002)
Estimating spatial patterns of soil erosion and deposition of the Andean region using geo-information techniques : a case study in Cochabamba, Bolivia
K. Beven, A. Binley (1992)
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction.Hydrological Processes, 6
(2003)
Evaluation of reliability and complexity of rainfall-sediment-runoff models
A. Doucet, S. Godsill, C. Andrieu (2000)
On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filteringStatistics and Computing, 10
G Govers (1990)
Empirical relationships on the transporting capacity of overland flowTransport and Deposition Processes, Proceedings of the Jerusalem Workshop, March-April in 1987, IAHS, 189
N. Gordon, D. Salmond, Adrian Smith (1993)
Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation, 140
Leon Higley, T. Huntington (2009)
Forensic Entomology: An Introduction, 46
Y. Kim, Y. Tachikawa, M. Shiiba, S. Kim, K. Yorozu, S. Noh (2013)
Simultaneous estimation of inflow and channel roughness using 2D hydraulic model and particle filtersJournal of Flood Risk Management, 6
V. Singh (1988)
Rainfall-runoff modeling
(2004)
Beyond the Kalman filter. ArtechHouse: 35-65
(1998)
Study on the Sediment Yield Estimation due to Land Development (I)
A Doucet, N Freitas, N Gordon (2001)
In Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer New York
M Sivapalan, JD Kalma (1995)
Scale Issues in Hydrological Modeling. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
A. Doucet, Nando Freitas, N. Gordon (2001)
An Introduction to Sequential Monte Carlo Methods
M. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, T. Clapp (2002)
A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian trackingIEEE Trans. Signal Process., 50
Y. Tachikawa, Gen Nagatani, K. Takara (2004)
DEVELOPMENT OF STAGE-DISCHARGE RELATIONSHIP EQUATION INCORPORATIONG SATURATED-UNSATURATED FLOW MECHANISMDoboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu B, 48
J. Laflen, L. Lane, G. Foster (1991)
WEPP: A new generation of erosion prediction technologyJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46
BE Vieux (2004)
Distributed hydrological modeling using GIS, Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2460-6
WH Wischmeier, DD Smith (1978)
No. 537, USDA-Science and Education Administration
(2013)
Geographic Information studies
V. Jetten, G. Govers, R. Hessel (2003)
Erosion models: quality of spatial predictionsHydrological Processes, 17
(2005)
Estimating spatial patterns of soil erosion and deposition in the Andean region using geo-information techniques: a case study in Cochabamba, Bolivia
A. Doucet, A. Johansen (2008)
A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen years later
E. Skop (1996)
Scale Issues in Hydrological ModelingEos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 77
(1978)
USDA-Science and Education Administration
B. Vieux (2001)
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GISDistributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS
L. Zhang, A. O'neill, S. Lacey (1996)
Modelling approaches to the prediction of soil erosion in catchmentsEnvironmental Software, 11
T. Takasao, M. Shiiba (1988)
Incorporation of the effect of concentration of flow into the kinematic wave equations and its applications to runoff system lumpingJournal of Hydrology, 102
K. Oost, Gerard Govers, W. Muysen (2003)
A process‐based conversion model for caesium‐137 derived erosion rates on agricultural land: an integrated spatial approachEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28
H. Gupta, K. Beven, Thorsten Wagener (2006)
Model Calibration and Uncertainty Estimation
C. Renschler, C. Mannaerts, B. Diekkrüger (1999)
Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soil erosion risk—rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, SpainCatena, 34
Recent advances in computer with geographic information system (GIS) technologies have allowed modelers to develop physics-based models for modeling soil erosion processes in time and space. However, it has been widely recognized that the effect of uncertainties on model predictions may be more significant when modelers apply such models for their own modeling purposes. Sources of uncertainty involved in modeling include data, model structural, and parameter uncertainty. To deal with the uncertain parameters of a catchment-scale soil erosion model (CSEM) and assess simulation uncertainties in soil erosion, particle filtering modeling (PF) is introduced in the CSEM. The proposed method, CSEM-PF, estimates parameters of non-linear and non-Gaussian systems, such as a physics-based soil erosion model by assimilating observation data such as discharge and sediment discharge sequences at outlets. PF provides timevarying feasible parameter sets as well as uncertainty bounds of outputs while traditional automatic calibration techniques result in a time-invariant global optimal parameter set. CSEM-PF was applied to a small mountainous catchment of the Yongdam dam in Korea for soil erosion modeling and uncertainty assessment for three historical typhoon events. Finally, the most optimal parameter sets and uncertainty bounds of simulation of both discharge and sediment discharge at each time step of the study events are provided.
Journal of Mountain Science – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 28, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.