Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S Donnenfeld S P Das (1989)
Oligopolistic Competition and International Trade: Quantity and Quality RestrictionsJournal of International Economics, 27
T W Ross A H Anis (1992)
Imperfect Competition and Pareto-Improving Strategic Trade PolicyJournal of International Economics, 33
G Saloner J Rotemberg (1989)
Tariffs vs Quotas with Implicit CollusionCanadian Journal of Economics, 22
J Bhagwati (1988)
Protectionism
K Krishna (1989)
Trade Restrictions as Facilitating PracticesJournal of International Economics, 26
K Krishna (1989)
?What do VERs do??
R C Feenstra (1984)
?Voluntary Export Restraint in U.S. Autos, 1980-81: Quality, Employment, and Welfare Effects,?
W J Ethier (1991)
?Voluntary Export Restraints,?
J D Geanakoplos J I Bulow (1985)
Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and ComplementsJournal of Political Economy, 93
Yoshiyasu Ono Motoshige Itoh (1984)
Tariffs vs. quotas under duopoly of heterogeneous goodsJournal of International Economics, 17
R Harris (1985)
Why Voluntary Export Restraints Are ?Voluntary?Canadian Journal of Economics, 18
Y Ono M Itoh (1982)
Tariffs, Quotas and Market StructureQuarterly Journal of Economics, 96
(1993)
?Who Benefits from Voluntary Export Restraints??
N L Schwartz M I Kamien (1983)
Conjectural VariationsCanadian Journal of Economics, 16
K Shimomura M C Kemp (1997)
Voluntary Export Restraints and Economic Welfare: A General Equilibrium AnalysisJapanese Economic Review, 48
J Bhagwati (1987)
VERs, Quid Pro Quo DFI and VIEs: Political-Economy-Theoretic AnalysesInternational Economic Journal, 1
Y Ono (1984)
Profitability of Export RestraintJournal of International Economics, 16
(1993)
?Voluntary Trade Restraints and Economic Welfare,?
Y Ono (1990)
Foreign Penetration and National Welfare under OligopolyJapan and the World Economy, 2
H Hwang C-C Mai (1988)
Why Voluntary Export Restraints are Voluntary: An ExtensionCanadian Journal of Economics, 21
V Pareto (1927)
Manual of Political Economy
K Suzumura (1996)
?Industrial Policy in Developing Market Economies,?
Abstract In this paper, we explore welfare implications of a voluntary export restraint (VER) agreement within a simple model of duopoly with product differentiation and conjectural variations. We assume that the foreign exporter does not sell its product in its own market and that the imposition of a VER makes the domestic firm into a Stackelberg leader. Under these assumptions, it is shown that a VER introduced at the free-trade equilibrium level of export is welfare-improving for the importing country if and only if the foreign exporter is forced to comply with the restraint involuntarily. In other words, it is impossible to benefit home country and foreign country simultaneously by a VER agreement within the class of models we are envisaging. This result holds irrespective of whether firms compete in terms of quantities or prices.
The Japanese Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 1997
Keywords: economics, general; microeconomics; macroeconomics/monetary economics//financial economics; econometrics; development economics; economic history
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.