Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Like all histories, this book is a writing of the present as well as the past. It is about reading as much as writing: how we read the texts of the past after a century of radical changes in writing, and of the expansion of Anglophone poetics that dealt with those changes and proposed further. These developments were largely read, rather than written, in Australia, yet in the later twentieth century there were major reimaginings of Australia’s cultural history that were “poetics by other means” (to adapt Marjorie Perloff), such as the writings of Paul Carter and Stephen Muecke. Poetry critics aware of this work include Martin Harrison (2004), who writes of the problem of our poetics’ history: Classifying systems, largely derived from English and American critics and historians, are applied to Australian writing, as if genetic accounts and histories of evolution similar to those of British and American writing can be mapped equidistantly across the structures of connection, response and contact which form the local histories of a local art. Borrowed terms like “pastoral,” “urban,” and “landscape” for instance, may work very differently or simply may not work at all when applied to Australian poetry. (78–79)]
Published: Dec 22, 2015
Keywords: Literary History; National Literature; Native Title; American Writing; American Critic
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.