Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
AbstractThere is a long-held belief among British field archaeologists that their approach to the study of the landscape is different from that of colleagues in most other parts of the world. This paper is an attempt to explore the validity of that belief and to discuss possible reasons for it. The argument put forward is that there is a distinct tradition of archaeological fieldwork within the British Isles which is qualitatively and methodologically different from styles of fieldwork that take place elsewhere, with exceptions in Scandinavia and Germany. This 'British tradition' comprises close observation and interpretation of the ground surface, direct measurement of all significant features, detailed analysis of the relationships between features and the production of a plan that illustrates the interpretation arrived at. The paper explores the history of this tradition and in particular the contribution of the Ordnance Survey. It concludes with a few remarks on future directions, which the authors hope to develop in a further paper.
Landscapes – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.