Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A comparison of A‐level performance in economics and business studies: How much more difficult is economics?

A comparison of A‐level performance in economics and business studies: How much more difficult is... This paper uses A‐Level Information System data to compare academic performance in two subjects often viewed as relatively close substitutes for one another at A‐level. The important role of GCSE achievement is confirmed for both subjects. There is evidence of strong gender effects and variation in outcomes across Examination Boards. A counterfactual exercise suggests that if the sample of Business Studies candidates had studied Economics nearly 40% of those who obtained a grade C or better in the former subject would not have done so in the latter. The opposite exercise suggests that 12% more Economics candidates would have achieved a grade C or better if they had taken Business Studies. In order to render a Business Studies A‐level grade comparable with an Economics one in terms of relative difficulty, we estimate that a downward adjustment of 1.5 UCAS points should be applied to the former subject. This adjustment is lower than that suggested by correction factors based on conventional subject pair analysis for these two subjects http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Education Economics Taylor & Francis

A comparison of A‐level performance in economics and business studies: How much more difficult is economics?

Education Economics , Volume 13 (1): 24 – Mar 1, 2005
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/a-comparison-of-a-level-performance-in-economics-and-business-studies-kblVShq0hl

References (58)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1469-5782
eISSN
0964-5292
DOI
10.1080/0964529042000325225
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper uses A‐Level Information System data to compare academic performance in two subjects often viewed as relatively close substitutes for one another at A‐level. The important role of GCSE achievement is confirmed for both subjects. There is evidence of strong gender effects and variation in outcomes across Examination Boards. A counterfactual exercise suggests that if the sample of Business Studies candidates had studied Economics nearly 40% of those who obtained a grade C or better in the former subject would not have done so in the latter. The opposite exercise suggests that 12% more Economics candidates would have achieved a grade C or better if they had taken Business Studies. In order to render a Business Studies A‐level grade comparable with an Economics one in terms of relative difficulty, we estimate that a downward adjustment of 1.5 UCAS points should be applied to the former subject. This adjustment is lower than that suggested by correction factors based on conventional subject pair analysis for these two subjects

Journal

Education EconomicsTaylor & Francis

Published: Mar 1, 2005

Keywords: Business Studies; Economics; subject difficulty; ordered probit

There are no references for this article.