Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

“A Crusade from the First”: The Norman Conquest of Islamic Sicily, 1060–1091

“A Crusade from the First”: The Norman Conquest of Islamic Sicily, 1060–1091 In the creation myth of the Crusades, Pope Urban II (r. 1088–1099) is the founding father and 1095 is the critical year. During the twentieth century, French, Spanish, and English scholars challenged this myth; yet this myth remains as durable as ever. Because the origins of the crusading enterprise came to be associated with the so-called First Crusade (1095–1102), scholars have created a vision of crusading at odds with Pope Urban's vision, which views the “First” Crusade as the third part of a triptych: first, the Norman conquest of Sicily (1060–1091); then, the Castilian and Catalan advances in Iberia; and finally the 1095 Eastern Crusade. Today, the study of the Crusades is hampered by a failure to concentrate on the direct evidence and to take into account what contemporaries understood by crusading. To get a sense of what contemporaries understood by crusading, this paper examines the Norman Crusade in Sicily, drawing upon both Christian and Islamic sources. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Al-Masaq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean Taylor & Francis

“A Crusade from the First”: The Norman Conquest of Islamic Sicily, 1060–1091

35 pages

“A Crusade from the First”: The Norman Conquest of Islamic Sicily, 1060–1091

Abstract

In the creation myth of the Crusades, Pope Urban II (r. 1088–1099) is the founding father and 1095 is the critical year. During the twentieth century, French, Spanish, and English scholars challenged this myth; yet this myth remains as durable as ever. Because the origins of the crusading enterprise came to be associated with the so-called First Crusade (1095–1102), scholars have created a vision of crusading at odds with Pope Urban's vision, which views the...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/a-crusade-from-the-first-the-norman-conquest-of-islamic-sicily-1060-5vyj6Wsisu
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1473-348X
eISSN
0950-3110
DOI
10.1080/09503110.2010.488891
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In the creation myth of the Crusades, Pope Urban II (r. 1088–1099) is the founding father and 1095 is the critical year. During the twentieth century, French, Spanish, and English scholars challenged this myth; yet this myth remains as durable as ever. Because the origins of the crusading enterprise came to be associated with the so-called First Crusade (1095–1102), scholars have created a vision of crusading at odds with Pope Urban's vision, which views the “First” Crusade as the third part of a triptych: first, the Norman conquest of Sicily (1060–1091); then, the Castilian and Catalan advances in Iberia; and finally the 1095 Eastern Crusade. Today, the study of the Crusades is hampered by a failure to concentrate on the direct evidence and to take into account what contemporaries understood by crusading. To get a sense of what contemporaries understood by crusading, this paper examines the Norman Crusade in Sicily, drawing upon both Christian and Islamic sources.

Journal

Al-Masaq: Journal of the Medieval MediterraneanTaylor & Francis

Published: Aug 1, 2010

Keywords: Crusades–1st Crusade (1096–1099); Sicily (kingdom)–crusades; Normans–in Sicily; Roger I, count of Sicily; Robert Guiscard, duke of Apulia, Calabria and Sicily; Amatus of Montecassini, chronicler; Geoffrey Malaterra, chronicler; William of Apulia, chronicler; al-Sulamī, ՙ Alī b. Ṭāhir, author

There are no references for this article.