Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Functional Analysis of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates

A Functional Analysis of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 are watershed events in America's political development. At that point, Senators were selected by state legislatures-citizens could not vote directly for their Senators. Still, these debates were well attended public events. Existing analyses (e.g., Jaffa, 1982; Zarefsky, 1990) have examined the issues (e.g., slavery and federalism); this essay has a more modest goal of comparing these messages with more recent Senate debates. Douglas, the incumbent, attacked more and acclaimed less than Lincoln, the challenger. Lincoln (who was the target of more attacks) produced more defenses than Douglas. The candidates' discourse was divided about evenly between policy and character. When discussing policy, they most frequently used general goals, followed by past deeds and then future plans. Character utterances were comprised of those about personal qualities, followed by ideals and, rarely, leadership ability. Comparisons revealed the Lincoln-Douglas debates to be more negative, with more emphasis on character (and less on policy) than recent Senate debates. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Argumentation and Advocacy Taylor & Francis

A Functional Analysis of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Benoit, William L.; Delbert, Jeffrey
Argumentation and Advocacy , Volume 46 (2): 6 – Sep 1, 2009
Download PDF

A Functional Analysis of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Abstract

The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 are watershed events in America's political development. At that point, Senators were selected by state legislatures-citizens could not vote directly for their Senators. Still, these debates were well attended public events. Existing analyses (e.g., Jaffa, 1982; Zarefsky, 1990) have examined the issues (e.g., slavery and federalism); this essay has a more modest goal of comparing these messages with more recent Senate debates. Douglas, the incumbent,...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/a-functional-analysis-of-the-lincoln-douglas-debates-XMuExOi3ai
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2009 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2576-8476
eISSN
1051-1431
DOI
10.1080/00028533.2009.11821720
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 are watershed events in America's political development. At that point, Senators were selected by state legislatures-citizens could not vote directly for their Senators. Still, these debates were well attended public events. Existing analyses (e.g., Jaffa, 1982; Zarefsky, 1990) have examined the issues (e.g., slavery and federalism); this essay has a more modest goal of comparing these messages with more recent Senate debates. Douglas, the incumbent, attacked more and acclaimed less than Lincoln, the challenger. Lincoln (who was the target of more attacks) produced more defenses than Douglas. The candidates' discourse was divided about evenly between policy and character. When discussing policy, they most frequently used general goals, followed by past deeds and then future plans. Character utterances were comprised of those about personal qualities, followed by ideals and, rarely, leadership ability. Comparisons revealed the Lincoln-Douglas debates to be more negative, with more emphasis on character (and less on policy) than recent Senate debates.

Journal

Argumentation and Advocacy – Taylor & Francis

Published: Sep 1, 2009

Keywords: Lincoln-Douglas debates; functional analysis

References

  • A functional analysis of televised U.S. Senate and gubernatorial campaign debates
  • Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defense in the 1960 presidential debates
  • The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
  • Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1848