Abstract

COMMENTARIES ical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: Uni- nate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of versity of Minnesota. Personality and Social Psychology, 42,1051-1068. Ones, D. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., &Hunter, J. E. (in press). Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1939). Some determinants of factor Personality and job performance: A critique of the Tett, Jackson, structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal oflerson- & Rothstein (1991) meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology. ality and Social Psychology, 57,552-567. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In W. Stroebe measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44,703-742. & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of socialpsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 21 1-245). New York: Wiley. Waller, N. G., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1987). Is it time for clinical Park, B., & Rothbaa, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogene- psychology to embrace the five-factor model of personality? ity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordi- American Psychologist, 42, 887-889. Robert E. Harlow and Nancy Cantor Princeton University Pervin provides an eye-opening analysis of