Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A letter and a reply concerning TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)

A letter and a reply concerning TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) FORUM Biodiversity is “Technology Protection System”—shades of Burson pleased to provide It’s “double-speak”! Marsteller!) is plainly and simply about maximizing profits this space for diverse A response to “In favour of the Technology Protection Sys- for its patent owner, and nothing else. [From R. Warren viewpoints on tem” [Biodiversity 1(1): p.36-37] biodiversity-related Bell , Box 3458, Salmon Arm, B.C., Canada V1E 4S2] issues. If you have an [In his article] Dr. Collins is writing from a commercial, opinion to share, a comment on any corporate point of view. It’s all about profits and market A letter and a reply article, or a challenge share, disguised as science and reasonableness. As such, for other readers, his piece is replete with slanted and incomplete and even please contact concerning TRIPS Catherine Ripley, morally questionable statements. I will address just three Managing Editor (see (Trade-Related Aspects of the many examples of such “double-speak.” masthead for address). In the paragraph under the heading WHY TPS?, Dr. Collins of Intellectual states that “this technology, which protects the intellec- Property Rights) tual property rights of the developer, will give North Ameri- can farmers a more level playing field when competing in Letter to the President, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biodiversity Taylor & Francis

A letter and a reply concerning TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)

Biodiversity , Volume 1 (3): 2 – Aug 1, 2000
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/a-letter-and-a-reply-concerning-trips-trade-related-aspects-of-lbsCOH0JwX

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2160-0651
eISSN
1488-8386
DOI
10.1080/14888386.2000.9712515
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

FORUM Biodiversity is “Technology Protection System”—shades of Burson pleased to provide It’s “double-speak”! Marsteller!) is plainly and simply about maximizing profits this space for diverse A response to “In favour of the Technology Protection Sys- for its patent owner, and nothing else. [From R. Warren viewpoints on tem” [Biodiversity 1(1): p.36-37] biodiversity-related Bell , Box 3458, Salmon Arm, B.C., Canada V1E 4S2] issues. If you have an [In his article] Dr. Collins is writing from a commercial, opinion to share, a comment on any corporate point of view. It’s all about profits and market A letter and a reply article, or a challenge share, disguised as science and reasonableness. As such, for other readers, his piece is replete with slanted and incomplete and even please contact concerning TRIPS Catherine Ripley, morally questionable statements. I will address just three Managing Editor (see (Trade-Related Aspects of the many examples of such “double-speak.” masthead for address). In the paragraph under the heading WHY TPS?, Dr. Collins of Intellectual states that “this technology, which protects the intellec- Property Rights) tual property rights of the developer, will give North Ameri- can farmers a more level playing field when competing in Letter to the President,

Journal

Biodiversity – Taylor & Francis

Published: Aug 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.