Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Beta, size and value effects on the JSE, 1994–2007

Beta, size and value effects on the JSE, 1994–2007 This paper builds on the observations of Van Rensburg and Robertson (2003a), who found persistent size and price-earnings effects in the cross-section of returns on the JSE, but surprisingly found that beta had, if anything, an inverse relationship with returns. Based on stock returns from January 1994 to October 2007, this portfolio-based study finds support for these earlier findings. However, when betas are estimated by the Dimson Aggregated Coefficients method with a lead and lag of at least three months, to compensate for the weaknesses of Ordinary Least Squares regression in the face of thin trading, the relationship between beta and return loses its statistical significance. We are left with the conclusion that beta has no predictive power for returns on the JSE, invalidating the CAPM, at least as it is commonly applied, based on a market proxy of the All- Share Index. We find further that the size premium is concentrated in the smallest stocks on the JSE, with no significant difference in returns between the four largest quintiles, and tentative evidence that it has been reducing over time. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Investment Analysts Journal Taylor & Francis

Beta, size and value effects on the JSE, 1994–2007

Strugnell, D; Gilbert, E; Kruger, R
Investment Analysts Journal , Volume 40 (74): 17 – Jan 1, 2011
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/beta-size-and-value-effects-on-the-jse-1994-2007-uozN5YnN4y

References (70)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2011 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2077-0227
eISSN
1029-3523
DOI
10.1080/10293523.2011.11082537
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper builds on the observations of Van Rensburg and Robertson (2003a), who found persistent size and price-earnings effects in the cross-section of returns on the JSE, but surprisingly found that beta had, if anything, an inverse relationship with returns. Based on stock returns from January 1994 to October 2007, this portfolio-based study finds support for these earlier findings. However, when betas are estimated by the Dimson Aggregated Coefficients method with a lead and lag of at least three months, to compensate for the weaknesses of Ordinary Least Squares regression in the face of thin trading, the relationship between beta and return loses its statistical significance. We are left with the conclusion that beta has no predictive power for returns on the JSE, invalidating the CAPM, at least as it is commonly applied, based on a market proxy of the All- Share Index. We find further that the size premium is concentrated in the smallest stocks on the JSE, with no significant difference in returns between the four largest quintiles, and tentative evidence that it has been reducing over time.

Journal

Investment Analysts Journal – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.