Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Centrally administered state-owned enterprises’ engagement in China’s public–private partnerships: a social network analysis

Centrally administered state-owned enterprises’ engagement in China’s public–private... A salient characteristic of China’s public–pgrivate partnerships (PPPs) is the deep involvement of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), particularly those administered by the central/national government (CSOEs). In this research social network analysis (SNA) was used to examine the role of different actors in transport and environmental protection PPPs in China in the period 2012–17. The results largely confirm the resource-based view and resource-dependency theory, showing that while CSOEs are dominant in both sectors, their dominance and control is greatest in transport sector projects that are more dependent on their accumulated experience, expertise, human capital assets and managemgent skills, that their dominance has increased over time, and that it is aligned with the provincial distribution of Chinese CSOEs. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Area Development and Policy Taylor & Francis

Centrally administered state-owned enterprises’ engagement in China’s public–private partnerships: a social network analysis

Download PDF

Centrally administered state-owned enterprises’ engagement in China’s public–private partnerships: a social network analysis

Abstract

A salient characteristic of China’s public–pgrivate partnerships (PPPs) is the deep involvement of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), particularly those administered by the central/national government (CSOEs). In this research social network analysis (SNA) was used to examine the role of different actors in transport and environmental protection PPPs in China in the period 2012–17. The results largely confirm the resource-based view and resource-dependency theory, showing that...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/centrally-administered-state-owned-enterprises-engagement-in-china-s-nrS4OpvKWt
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2020 Regional Studies Association
ISSN
2379-2957
eISSN
2379-2949
DOI
10.1080/23792949.2020.1851608
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A salient characteristic of China’s public–pgrivate partnerships (PPPs) is the deep involvement of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), particularly those administered by the central/national government (CSOEs). In this research social network analysis (SNA) was used to examine the role of different actors in transport and environmental protection PPPs in China in the period 2012–17. The results largely confirm the resource-based view and resource-dependency theory, showing that while CSOEs are dominant in both sectors, their dominance and control is greatest in transport sector projects that are more dependent on their accumulated experience, expertise, human capital assets and managemgent skills, that their dominance has increased over time, and that it is aligned with the provincial distribution of Chinese CSOEs.

Journal

Area Development and Policy – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2021

Keywords: public–private partnerships; state-owned enterprises; resource-based view; resource-dependency theory; social network analysis; H30, H41, H57, L2, O23; 政府和社会资本合作; 国有企业; 资源基础理论; 资源依赖理论; 社会网络分析; sociedades públicas–privadas; empresas estatales; perspectiva basada en los recursos; teoría de dependencia de los recursos; análisis de redes sociales; государственно–частное партнерство; государственные предприятия; ресурсный подход; теория ресурсной зависимости; анализ общественных сетей

References

  • Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
  • Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks
  • The interorganizational network as a political economy
  • Centrality and network flow
  • The provincial pattern of the relationship between urbanization and economic development in China
  • Spatio-temporal dynamics of public–private partnership projects in China
  • A resource-based theory of strategic alliance
  • Introducing public–private partnerships for metropolitan subways in China: What is the evidence?
  • Central protectionism in China: The “central SOE problem” in environmental governance
  • Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms
  • A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness
  • Governance capacity, state policy and the rise of the Chongqing notebook computer cluster
  • Computational socioeconomics
  • Quantifying China’s regional economic complexity
  • A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances
  • Public–private partnerships: An international performance review
  • Does state ownership facilitate outward FDI of Chinese SOEs? Institutional development, market competition, and the logic of interdependence between governments and SOEs
  • Where have China’s state monopolies gone?
  • Creating and capturing value in public–private ties: A private actor’s perspective
  • Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance
  • Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases
  • The formation of public–private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands
  • Development of public–private partnership (PPP) projects in the Chinese water sector
  • Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries
  • Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China
  • Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in public–private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of Australia and China
  • Can the pilot public–private partnerships project be applied in future urban rail development? A case study of Beijing Metro Line 4 project
  • Land-based finance and property tax in China
  • Vital nodes identification in complex networks
  • The rise and fall of public–private partnerships in China: A path-dependent approach
  • Modularity and community structure in networks
  • A strategic partnering framework analysis methodology for public‐private partnerships
  • Dui guoyouqiye zuowei shehuiziben canyu PPP de jidian sikao [Thoughts on SOEs’ participation in the public–private partnerships]
  • Public–private partnerships in health services delivery
  • The rise of public–private partnerships in China: An effective financing approach for infrastructure investment?
  • Overseas impacts of China’s outward direct investment
  • Commercial investment in public–private partnerships: The impact of contract characteristics
  • Bridges in complex networks
  • PPP application in infrastructure development in China: Institutional analysis and implications
  • The formation of public–private partnerships in China: An institutional perspective
  • The rise of public–private partnerships in China
  • “New public management” in China at the local level: Competition-driven local public service reform in Tianjin
  • Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances