Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Similar to making purchasing decisions, people's support for wildlife management actions can be influenced by various tradeoffs and contextual factors. Using conjoint analyses, we assessed the relative importance of three factors associated with possible management actions for reducing human-related impacts on sea turtle nesting in Ogasawara Islands, Japan. The factors were examined in a 2007 door-to-door survey of Ogasawara residents (n = 553, 63% response rate) and included: (a) beach patrol, (b) restrictions on human behavior, and (c) restrictions on beach access. Restrictions on beach access was the most important factor influencing residents' support for and compliance with the management actions. Within each factor, factor levels resulting in greater changes from the current condition (more restrictions) contributed to lower levels of support and compliance. Results highlight the importance of considering contextual variables in anticipating public response to wildlife management alternatives.
Human Dimensions of Wildlife – Taylor & Francis
Published: Sep 1, 2011
Keywords: conjoint analysis; management actions; Japan; green turtles ( Chelonia mydas )
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.