Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Corrigendum

Corrigendum International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management Vol. 8, No. 3, September 2012, 286 Petz K, van Oudenhoven APE. 2012. Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosys Serv Manag. 8(1–2):135–155. In Volume 8, issues 1–2, of the International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, three errors were found on pages 141 and 145 of the article ‘Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands’ by Katalin Petz and Alexander PE van Oudenhoven. The authors apologise for the errors and any inconvenience caused as a result of these errors made. On page 141, in both the caption of Figure 4c and the section ‘Air quality regulation’, the per hectare values of PM10 cap- ture should be expressed in kg/ha/year instead of t/ha/year. The correct caption of Figure 4c should be ‘PM10 captured in kg/ha/year’, and the correct corresponding sentence should be ‘Coniferous forests can capture 94 kg PM10/ha/year (high), deciduous forests 54 kg PM10/ha/year and heathland, natural grass and green elements 27 kg PM10/ha/year. The rest of the land-use types can capture less than 15 kg/ha/year (low) and we assumed that urban areas capture no fine dust (Figure 4c)’. On page 141, in the section ‘Production of raw materials (fodder)’, the unit should be t/year instead of kg/year. The correct phrase should read: ‘Maize is cultivated on 5500 ha (Figure 4b). The average silage maize yield in 2010 was 45 t/ha (CBS 2011a), resulting in 250,000 t/year maize production in the Groene Woud’. On page 145, in the discussion on the results of milk production, the value for milk production should be 165 t/km 2 2 instead of 170 t/km . In addition, it should be noted that the value 165 t/km refers to non-organic milk production; the value for organic milk production was calculated to be 136 t/km . ISSN 2151-3732 print/ISSN 2151-3740 online © 2012 Taylor & Francis http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.714096 http://www.tandfonline.com http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management Taylor & Francis

Corrigendum

Download PDF
1 page

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/corrigendum-xRRE8wlDup

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2151-3732
eISSN
2151-3740
DOI
10.1080/21513732.2012.714096
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management Vol. 8, No. 3, September 2012, 286 Petz K, van Oudenhoven APE. 2012. Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosys Serv Manag. 8(1–2):135–155. In Volume 8, issues 1–2, of the International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, three errors were found on pages 141 and 145 of the article ‘Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands’ by Katalin Petz and Alexander PE van Oudenhoven. The authors apologise for the errors and any inconvenience caused as a result of these errors made. On page 141, in both the caption of Figure 4c and the section ‘Air quality regulation’, the per hectare values of PM10 cap- ture should be expressed in kg/ha/year instead of t/ha/year. The correct caption of Figure 4c should be ‘PM10 captured in kg/ha/year’, and the correct corresponding sentence should be ‘Coniferous forests can capture 94 kg PM10/ha/year (high), deciduous forests 54 kg PM10/ha/year and heathland, natural grass and green elements 27 kg PM10/ha/year. The rest of the land-use types can capture less than 15 kg/ha/year (low) and we assumed that urban areas capture no fine dust (Figure 4c)’. On page 141, in the section ‘Production of raw materials (fodder)’, the unit should be t/year instead of kg/year. The correct phrase should read: ‘Maize is cultivated on 5500 ha (Figure 4b). The average silage maize yield in 2010 was 45 t/ha (CBS 2011a), resulting in 250,000 t/year maize production in the Groene Woud’. On page 145, in the discussion on the results of milk production, the value for milk production should be 165 t/km 2 2 instead of 170 t/km . In addition, it should be noted that the value 165 t/km refers to non-organic milk production; the value for organic milk production was calculated to be 136 t/km . ISSN 2151-3732 print/ISSN 2151-3740 online © 2012 Taylor & Francis http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.714096 http://www.tandfonline.com

Journal

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management – Taylor & Francis

Published: Sep 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.