Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Delineation of geochemical anomalies for mineral exploration using combining U-statistic method and fractal technique: U-N and U-A models

Delineation of geochemical anomalies for mineral exploration using combining U-statistic method... In this study, by using the algorithm of the U-statistic and fractal methods and combining them with each other, a new combined method as U values fractal model (U-N and U-A) is introduced. Then, the proposed method is employed to determine the boundaries of background and anomalous populations. Results show that in U-N and U-A fractal models, the first fracture boundary is much clearer and more accurate than previous fractal models (C-N and C-A) in the same condition. In U-N model, due to the nature of the U method algorithm, there is a discontinuity as exact threshold between background and anomaly that in U-A model, this does not exist due to the homogenization of U values. In this method, the exact threshold between background and anomaly is determined by U-statistic method and by its combination with the fractal method, in each population, sub-populations are identified more accurately and simply than concentration fractal model. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Earth Science Taylor & Francis

Delineation of geochemical anomalies for mineral exploration using combining U-statistic method and fractal technique: U-N and U-A models

Delineation of geochemical anomalies for mineral exploration using combining U-statistic method and fractal technique: U-N and U-A models

Abstract

In this study, by using the algorithm of the U-statistic and fractal methods and combining them with each other, a new combined method as U values fractal model (U-N and U-A) is introduced. Then, the proposed method is employed to determine the boundaries of background and anomalous populations. Results show that in U-N and U-A fractal models, the first fracture boundary is much clearer and more accurate than previous fractal models (C-N and C-A) in the same condition. In U-N model, due to...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/delineation-of-geochemical-anomalies-for-mineral-exploration-using-ARH5dntDns
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2022 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and The AusIMM
ISSN
2572-6838
eISSN
2572-6846
DOI
10.1080/25726838.2022.2041151
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this study, by using the algorithm of the U-statistic and fractal methods and combining them with each other, a new combined method as U values fractal model (U-N and U-A) is introduced. Then, the proposed method is employed to determine the boundaries of background and anomalous populations. Results show that in U-N and U-A fractal models, the first fracture boundary is much clearer and more accurate than previous fractal models (C-N and C-A) in the same condition. In U-N model, due to the nature of the U method algorithm, there is a discontinuity as exact threshold between background and anomaly that in U-A model, this does not exist due to the homogenization of U values. In this method, the exact threshold between background and anomaly is determined by U-statistic method and by its combination with the fractal method, in each population, sub-populations are identified more accurately and simply than concentration fractal model.

Journal

Applied Earth ScienceTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2022

Keywords: Mineral exploration; porphyry deposits; anomalies delineation; Parkam; U-STATISTICS; U-N and U-A fractal

References