Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/taylor-francis/dudas-sobre-la-duda-razonable-SUXXpeWY9p
References (31)
-
J. Davis, N. Kerr, Garold Stasser, David Meek, R. Holt (1977)
Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18
-
M. Saks, R. Hastie (1978)
Social psychology in court -
(1977)
Vicrim consequences , senrence severiry , and decision process in mock juries -
Marina Miller, J. Hewitt (1978)
Conviction of a Defendant as a Function of Juror-Victim Racial SimilarityJournal of Social Psychology, 105
-
The law and informarion processing : Implications for verdicrs in rape cases -
D. Ugwuegbu (1979)
Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibilityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15
-
S. Nagel, D. Lamm, M. Neef (1981)
Decision Theory and Juror Decision -Making -
Julie Allison (1996)
The Law and Information Processing: Implications for Verdicts in Rape Cases1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26
-
H. Feild (1978)
Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rapeLaw and Human Behavior, 2
-
C. Lago, Ramón Fernández, F. Rivera (1994)
Impacto de la calidad y ubicación de las instrucciones sobre la carga de la prueba en la formación de juicios de los jurados -
W. Alberts (1961)
Measuring ministers' attitudes toward juvenile delinquency. -
Nicky Phillips (2022)
She was convicted of killing her four children. Could a gene mutation set her free?Nature, 611
-
C. Cowan, W. Thompson, P. Ellsworth (1984)
The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberationLaw and Human Behavior, 8
-
Ramón Rossell, F. Rivera, C. Lago (1994)
Análisis de contenido en la interacción de jurados legos homogéneos, 20
-
R. Simon, L. Mahan (1971)
Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the ClassroomLaw & Society Review, 5
-
(1979)
The orher issues in jury sirnulation research : A comrnenrary wirh particular reference ro defendanr character studies -
I. Horowitz (1997)
Reasonable doubt instructions: Commonsense justice and standard of proof.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3
-
D. Bem, A. Allen (1974)
ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIORPsychological Review, 81
-
James Scroggs (1976)
Penalties for Rape as a Function of Victim Provocativeness, Damage, and ResistanceJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 6
-
Francisca Fariña, Ramón Arce, C. Lago (1999)
Efectos de la composición del jurado en los estilos deliberativos, análisis cognitivo y de contenido de la deliberaciónAnuario de Psicología, 30
-
R. Arce, F. Fariña, Carlos Vila, M. Novo (1998)
The Jury Decision Rule: An Empirical Study of Four Methods -
(1995)
Análisis de los factores individuales y grupales explicativos de la indulgencia / rigidez de los jurados -
Catherine Marshall, J. Wise (1975)
Juror Decisions and the Determination of Guilt in Capital Punishment Cases: A Bayesian Perspective -
I. Horowitz, Laird Kirkpatrick (1996)
A concept in search of a definition: The effects of reasonable doubt instructions on certainty of guilt standards and jury verdictsLaw and Human Behavior, 20
-
(1987)
Differentiating among inrernaliry powerfull , others and change -
Racial and evidenrial facrors in juror artriburions oflegal responsabiliry , fournal of Expenmenial Social Psycbology -
R. Arce, J. Sobral, Francisca Fariña (1992)
Verdicts of Psychosocially Biased Juries -
On predicring some of the people some of rhe time : The search for cross - siruational consistencies in behavior -
H. Feild
Juror Background Characteristics and Attitudes Toward Rape Correlates of Jurors' Decisions in Rape Trials -
N. Vidmar (1979)
The other issues in jury simulation researchLaw and Human Behavior, 3
-
The juey decision rule : An empirical srudy offour rnethods
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Copyright
- © 1999 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
- ISSN
- 1579-3699
- eISSN
- 0210-9395
- DOI
- 10.1174/02109399960256793
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
ResumenEl intento legal de control de los sesgos en la toma de decisiones por parte de jurados viene de la mano de las instrucciones judiciales sobre la carga de la prueba. Este trabajo analiza los efectos del criterio “duda razonable” sobre la decisión de los jurados. Los resultados contradicen las predicciones apareciend diferencias en la cuantificación de este estándar de culpabilidad mediadas por la interacción del tipo d caso (p.e., violación, robo, fuga d divisas y negligencia médica) y algunas variables psicosociales (i.e., género, locus de control, autoposicionamiento político, dogmatismo, actitudes hacia la delincuencia juvenil, conservadurismo). Finalmente se discuten los resultados con vistas a formar jurados que ejecuten de un modo eficaz.
Journal
Studies in Psychology: Estudios de Psicología – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Keywords: Jurados; toma de decisions; formación de juicios; carga de la prueba; Juror judgment making; jury decision making; standard of proof; reasonable doubt