Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editorial

Editorial LANDSCAPES, 2017 VOL. 18, NO. 2, 101 https://doi.org/10.1080/14662035.2018.1429712 Unusually, the papers in this issue are restricted to British and Irish topics, which is often seen as the principal ‘original’ geographical scope of Landscape (although from his first editorials our founding editor, Richard Muir, made perfectly clear – to use that currently fashionable British politicians’ politician slogan – that he hoped for a wider purview). We have rarely had an issue of Landscapes for several years now that does not include at least one paper from or about another country, and written in an English that is not native. Is this another reflection of the inward-looking-ness that seems to have befallen us as the world builds new walls? Or is it coincidence, and temporary? The papers in this issue are also written from primarily historical – and mainly archaeological – perspectives, which has also become slightly unusual for our journal, which in recent issues has welcomed contributors using (sub-)disciplines as diverse as eco-criticism, environmental history, epidemiology, ecology and ecological niche theory (to name only those beginning with ‘e’). We think it is worth repeating for those who read edi- torials that Landscapes continues to be open to papers about landscapes http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Landscapes Taylor & Francis

Editorial

Landscapes , Volume 18 (2): 1 – Jul 3, 2017

Editorial

Landscapes , Volume 18 (2): 1 – Jul 3, 2017

Abstract

LANDSCAPES, 2017 VOL. 18, NO. 2, 101 https://doi.org/10.1080/14662035.2018.1429712 Unusually, the papers in this issue are restricted to British and Irish topics, which is often seen as the principal ‘original’ geographical scope of Landscape (although from his first editorials our founding editor, Richard Muir, made perfectly clear – to use that currently fashionable British politicians’ politician slogan – that he hoped for a wider purview). We have rarely had an issue of Landscapes for several years now that does not include at least one paper from or about another country, and written in an English that is not native. Is this another reflection of the inward-looking-ness that seems to have befallen us as the world builds new walls? Or is it coincidence, and temporary? The papers in this issue are also written from primarily historical – and mainly archaeological – perspectives, which has also become slightly unusual for our journal, which in recent issues has welcomed contributors using (sub-)disciplines as diverse as eco-criticism, environmental history, epidemiology, ecology and ecological niche theory (to name only those beginning with ‘e’). We think it is worth repeating for those who read edi- torials that Landscapes continues to be open to papers about landscapes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/editorial-7cbaqlvm2L

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN
2040-8153
eISSN
1466-2035
DOI
10.1080/14662035.2018.1429712
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

LANDSCAPES, 2017 VOL. 18, NO. 2, 101 https://doi.org/10.1080/14662035.2018.1429712 Unusually, the papers in this issue are restricted to British and Irish topics, which is often seen as the principal ‘original’ geographical scope of Landscape (although from his first editorials our founding editor, Richard Muir, made perfectly clear – to use that currently fashionable British politicians’ politician slogan – that he hoped for a wider purview). We have rarely had an issue of Landscapes for several years now that does not include at least one paper from or about another country, and written in an English that is not native. Is this another reflection of the inward-looking-ness that seems to have befallen us as the world builds new walls? Or is it coincidence, and temporary? The papers in this issue are also written from primarily historical – and mainly archaeological – perspectives, which has also become slightly unusual for our journal, which in recent issues has welcomed contributors using (sub-)disciplines as diverse as eco-criticism, environmental history, epidemiology, ecology and ecological niche theory (to name only those beginning with ‘e’). We think it is worth repeating for those who read edi- torials that Landscapes continues to be open to papers about landscapes

Journal

LandscapesTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2017

There are no references for this article.