Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Mok (2006)
Shedding Light on the East Asian Learner Paradox: Reconstructing student-centredness in a Shanghai classroomAsia Pacific Journal of Education, 26
Xiaochen Zhou, Ada Mau, L. Jordan (2020)
Gaming the no-choice system? School choice and persistent educational inequality in ChinaResearch Papers in Education, 37
Ann Owens (2020)
Unequal Opportunity: School and Neighborhood Segregation in the USARace and Social Problems, 12
Huriya Jabbar, Carlton Fong, Emily Germain, Dongmei Li, Joanna Sánchez, Weinan Sun, Michelle Devall (2019)
The Competitive Effects of School Choice on Student Achievement: A Systematic ReviewEducational Policy, 36
Hui Dong, Lulu Li (2019)
School Choice in China: Past, Present, and FutureECNU Review of Education, 2
Lihua Wang, T. Holland (2011)
In search of educational equity for the migrant children of ShanghaiComparative Education, 47
Wei Zhang, M. Bray (2017)
Micro-neoliberalism in China: public-private interactions at the confluence of mainstream and shadow educationJournal of Education Policy, 32
Xiaoxin Wu (2013)
The power of social capital in school choice in a Chinese cityAustralian Journal of Education, 57
Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Yeon-Koo Che, Yosuke Yasuda (2008)
Expanding 'Choice' in School ChoiceEconomic Research Initiatives at Duke (ERID) Working Papers Series
Jia Zhang, Nicholas Pang (2016)
Investigating the development of professional learning communities: compare schools in Shanghai and Southwest ChinaAsia Pacific Journal of Education, 36
H. Ergin, Tayfun Sönmez (2006)
Games of school choice under the Boston mechanismJournal of Public Economics, 90
Charlene Tan (2019)
Parental responses to education reform in Singapore, Shanghai and Hong KongAsia Pacific Education Review, 20
Yan Chen, Onur Kesten (2019)
Chinese college admissions and school choice reforms: An experimental studyGames Econ. Behav., 115
Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Parag Pathak, A. Roth, T. Sonmez (2006)
Changing the Boston School Choice MechanismERN: Other Public Choice: Public Goods (Topic)
S. Ball (2003)
Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage
Charlene Tan (2019)
Neoliberalism as exception: the New High-Quality School project in ShanghaiDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40
Glenn Savage, S. Sellar, Radhika Gorur (2013)
Equity and marketisation: emerging policies and practices in Australian educationDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34
B. Lingard, S. Sellar, Glenn Savage (2014)
Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: the effects of testing and data infrastructuresBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 35
Shu Zhou, M. Cheung (2017)
Hukou system effects on migrant children’s education in China: Learning from past disparitiesInternational Social Work, 60
Glenn Savage (2013)
Tailored equities in the education market: flexible policies and practicesDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34
Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Tayfun Sönmez (2003)
School Choice: A Mechanism Design ApproachThe American Economic Review, 93
Charlene Tan (2019)
PISA and education reform in ShanghaiCritical Studies in Education, 60
D. Reay (2012)
What would a socially just education system look like?: saving the minnows from the pikeJournal of Education Policy, 27
Liu Yang (2022)
How does cultural capital influence the school choice of rural and urban migrant families in Nanjing, China? Evidence from a survey studyAustralian and International Journal of Rural Education
Yan Chen, Onur Kesten (2017)
Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 125
Min Zhu (2014)
College Admissions in China: A Mechanism Design PerspectiveEconometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal
B. Bereményi, Sílvia Carrasco (2018)
Caught in the triangle of mobility: social, residential and pupil mobilityBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 39
Hao Feng, Ming Lu (2013)
School quality and housing prices: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment in Shanghai, ChinaJournal of Housing Economics, 22
R. Waddington, M. Berends (2018)
Impact of the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program: Achievement Effects for Students in Upper Elementary and Middle SchoolJournal of Policy Analysis and Management
Guopeng Fu, A. Clarke (2018)
Teachers’ moral agency under neo-liberal influences: what is educationally desirable in China’s curriculum reform?Educational Review, 71
B. Francis, Martin Mills (2012)
Schools as damaging organisations: instigating a dialogue concerning alternative models of schoolingPedagogy, Culture & Society, 20
Bo Ning (2021)
Principals’ time allocation in the context of Shanghai school administrationAsia Pacific Journal of Education, 41
Yun-feng You (2020)
Run by others: school autonomy in Shanghai’s entrustment management reformAsia Pacific Journal of Education, 41
S. Smala, Jesus Paz, B. Lingard (2013)
Languages, cultural capital and school choice: distinction and second-language immersion programmesBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 34
This paper focuses on educational equity in China using the experience of school choice reform in Shanghai. The education authority in Shanghai has launched a host of policy measures to address “school choice fever” (zexiao re) where parents compete to enrol their children in a top-performing school. The policy initiative has been enacted through three strategies that collectively seek to make admission into elite public and minban (people-managed) schools more difficult. However, the policy measure has not dislodged the fundamental societal perception of a good school as one that delivers high test scores. Furthermore, the policy change has paradoxically reinforced the existing inequalities between schools and families. The developments in Shanghai point to the mediating and influential role of parental choice in equity policy against a backdrop of neoliberal ideas and practices. The Shanghai example underscores how a school choice model, despite its best intention, may not succeed in ensuring educational equity for students because of parental intervention and counter-measures to education policy.
Asia Pacific Journal of Education – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jun 8, 2023
Keywords: Educational equity; elite school; education policy; school choice reform; Shanghai
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.