Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Enforced commensuration and the bureaucratic invention of household energy insecurity

Enforced commensuration and the bureaucratic invention of household energy insecurity Power doesn't come for free, but who should pay the cost? On the Aṉangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in northwest South Australia, Aṉangu households have not historically been billed for domestic energy consumption. The state government has recently introduced a prepayment regime, ostensibly to curb supply costs. Yet extending the norms of customer payment for domestic energy requires significant administrative labour, with limited potential to recoup costs through billing. This article asks: why is enforced commensuration preferable to the status quo? It describes the invention of household energy insecurity via policy reform, including the establishment of a ‘compensatory bureaucratic infrastructure’ of customer policies, contracts, tariffs, and concessions designed to mitigate the harms produced by the introduction of prepayment. With the status quo deemed untenable and the transition to mainstreaming customer payment apparently inevitable, the article examines how geography and race operate as organising principles for the limits of difference among citizens under late liberal government in remote Australia. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Geographer Taylor & Francis

Enforced commensuration and the bureaucratic invention of household energy insecurity

Grealy, Liam
Australian Geographer , Volume 54 (2): 18 – Apr 3, 2023
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/enforced-commensuration-and-the-bureaucratic-invention-of-household-eDiwOReGF1

References (53)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2022 Geographical Society of New South Wales Inc.
ISSN
1465-3311
eISSN
0004-9182
DOI
10.1080/00049182.2022.2127144
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Power doesn't come for free, but who should pay the cost? On the Aṉangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in northwest South Australia, Aṉangu households have not historically been billed for domestic energy consumption. The state government has recently introduced a prepayment regime, ostensibly to curb supply costs. Yet extending the norms of customer payment for domestic energy requires significant administrative labour, with limited potential to recoup costs through billing. This article asks: why is enforced commensuration preferable to the status quo? It describes the invention of household energy insecurity via policy reform, including the establishment of a ‘compensatory bureaucratic infrastructure’ of customer policies, contracts, tariffs, and concessions designed to mitigate the harms produced by the introduction of prepayment. With the status quo deemed untenable and the transition to mainstreaming customer payment apparently inevitable, the article examines how geography and race operate as organising principles for the limits of difference among citizens under late liberal government in remote Australia.

Journal

Australian Geographer – Taylor & Francis

Published: Apr 3, 2023

Keywords: Bureaucracy; prepayment meters; energy poverty; remote communities; settler colonialism; policy

There are no references for this article.