Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Hines (1988)
Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct realityAccounting Organizations and Society, 13
E. Matthews (1983)
Reason, Truth and History.Philosophical Books, 24
H. Kincaid (1998)
Positivism in the social sciences
Accounting Standards Steering Committee (1 975). The Corporate Report
Simon Archer (1998)
Mattessich's Critique of Accounting: a review articleAccounting and Business Research, 28
R. Yin (1984)
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
J. Ravetz (2020)
Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems
L. Donaldson (1985)
In defence of organization theory : a reply to the critics
H. Putnam (1981)
Reason, Truth and History: Contents
A. Rosenberg (2018)
Philosophy of Social Science
Simon Archer (1997)
The ASB's Exposure Draft Statement of Principles: A CommentAccounting and Business Research, 27
D. Alexander, Simon Archer (2003)
On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the ‘true and fair override’Accounting and Business Research, 33
K. Gergen (1998)
Constructionism And Realism: How Are We To Go On?
K. Peasnell (1978)
Statement of Accounting Theory and Theory AcceptanceAccounting and Business Research, 8
(1993)
On the methodology of constructing a conceptual framework for financial accounting
R. Watts, J. Zimmerman (2006)
Positive Accounting Theory
Steven Brown, J. Pujol, Beryl Curt (1998)
As One in a Web? Discourse, Materiality and the Place of Ethics
Accouiiriii,q uiid Birritiess Rexwrch. Vol 37. No. I pp. 55-58. 2007 Financial and external reporting research: the broadening corporate governance challenge A comment Simon Archer* book by Watts and Zimmerman (1 986) which re- Professor Parker raises some important issues con- cerning the shortcomings of, and major issues ig- viewed a considerable number of such publica- tions was entitled Positive Accounting Theory. nored or inadequately addressed by, mainstream research into what he calls Financial and External One might infer from this that one of those char- acteristics is positivism. However, consulting Reporting (FER). My concern is that because of the way he chooses to raise these issues, he may philosophical dictionaries gives no very clear idea find himself largely preaching to the converted. of what ‘positivism’ is. Some historical context is For his critique of mainstream FER research is not required in order to understand the relevant sense merely polemical in tone, but is lacking in philo- of the word. In FER, the term ‘positivism’ may be sophical or historical perspectives, and his propos- suggested by the desire of FER researchers to als for re-orientating FER research overlook some move away from the attempts in the 1950s and key
Accounting and Business Research – Taylor & Francis
Published: Mar 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.