Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Freedom of speech versus racial justice: Homeplace theory, antiparallelism, and becoming-minor

Freedom of speech versus racial justice: Homeplace theory, antiparallelism, and becoming-minor Abstract This article examines the reasons that Whiteness and social justice have adopted conceptions of democracy and freedom that seem to conflict and yet do not directly conflict. The argument starts by framing a problem of democracy and freedom as property issued to White people within a dominant majoritarian semiotic system. By using critical race theory and linguistic philosophy, we describe how conflict suppression maintains a homeplace, a social justice semiotic subsystem that suppresses conflict with Whiteness, thereby protecting both the homeplace and Whiteness simultaneously. We argue that public administration theory offers unique opportunities to promote and enrich these sites of resistance to reterritorialize democracy and freedom in new and inclusive ways. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Administrative Theory & Praxis Taylor & Francis

Freedom of speech versus racial justice: Homeplace theory, antiparallelism, and becoming-minor

Administrative Theory & Praxis , Volume 43 (3): 20 – Jul 3, 2021

Freedom of speech versus racial justice: Homeplace theory, antiparallelism, and becoming-minor

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the reasons that Whiteness and social justice have adopted conceptions of democracy and freedom that seem to conflict and yet do not directly conflict. The argument starts by framing a problem of democracy and freedom as property issued to White people within a dominant majoritarian semiotic system. By using critical race theory and linguistic philosophy, we describe how conflict suppression maintains a homeplace, a social justice semiotic subsystem that...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/freedom-of-speech-versus-racial-justice-homeplace-theory-v5F8vbHk7a
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2020 Public Administration Theory Network
ISSN
1949-0461
eISSN
1084-1806
DOI
10.1080/10841806.2020.1782127
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the reasons that Whiteness and social justice have adopted conceptions of democracy and freedom that seem to conflict and yet do not directly conflict. The argument starts by framing a problem of democracy and freedom as property issued to White people within a dominant majoritarian semiotic system. By using critical race theory and linguistic philosophy, we describe how conflict suppression maintains a homeplace, a social justice semiotic subsystem that suppresses conflict with Whiteness, thereby protecting both the homeplace and Whiteness simultaneously. We argue that public administration theory offers unique opportunities to promote and enrich these sites of resistance to reterritorialize democracy and freedom in new and inclusive ways.

Journal

Administrative Theory & PraxisTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2021

Keywords: Becoming-minor; homeplace theory; semiotics; social justice; Whiteness

References