Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fuzzy Inference as Deduction

Fuzzy Inference as Deduction The term fuzzy logic has two different meanings -broad and narrow. In Zadeh's opinion ([19]), fuzzy logic (in the narrow sense) is an extension of many- valued logic but having a different agenda—as generalized modus ponens, max-min inference, linguistic quantifiers etc. The question we address in this paper is whether there is something in Zadeh's specific agenda which cannot be grasped by “classiceli”, “traditional” mathematical (many-valued) logic. We show that much of fuzzy logic can be understood as classical deduction in a many-sorted many-valued Pavelka- Lukasiewicz style rational quantification logic. This means that, besides the linguistic or approximation aspects, the logical aspect (symbolic, deductive) is present too and can be made explicit. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics Taylor & Francis

Fuzzy Inference as Deduction

24 pages

Fuzzy Inference as Deduction

Abstract

The term fuzzy logic has two different meanings -broad and narrow. In Zadeh's opinion ([19]), fuzzy logic (in the narrow sense) is an extension of many- valued logic but having a different agenda—as generalized modus ponens, max-min inference, linguistic quantifiers etc. The question we address in this paper is whether there is something in Zadeh's specific agenda which cannot be grasped by “classiceli”, “traditional” mathematical (many-valued) logic....
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/fuzzy-inference-as-deduction-uQb2VIuvoZ
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1958-5780
eISSN
1166-3081
DOI
10.1080/11663081.1999.10510957
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The term fuzzy logic has two different meanings -broad and narrow. In Zadeh's opinion ([19]), fuzzy logic (in the narrow sense) is an extension of many- valued logic but having a different agenda—as generalized modus ponens, max-min inference, linguistic quantifiers etc. The question we address in this paper is whether there is something in Zadeh's specific agenda which cannot be grasped by “classiceli”, “traditional” mathematical (many-valued) logic. We show that much of fuzzy logic can be understood as classical deduction in a many-sorted many-valued Pavelka- Lukasiewicz style rational quantification logic. This means that, besides the linguistic or approximation aspects, the logical aspect (symbolic, deductive) is present too and can be made explicit.

Journal

Journal of Applied Non-Classical LogicsTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.