Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups

Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups Abstract This study addresses a scholarship need to use more gender-conscious, structuration theory to explore the investment funding ecosystem on start-up social enterprises. The paper examines gendered disparities in start-up equity funding available to non-profit, for-profit, and hybrid social ventures, and amongst ventures with and without invention-based technologies. Analysis consists of 17,440 start-up ventures that applied to the Global Accelerator Learning Initiative (GALI) between 2013 and 2019, and quantitatively tests three hypotheses. These hypotheses suggest differences across (1) the gender composition of founder teams and venture type; (2) equity funding available by gender and across venture types; and (3) gendered differences between invention-based ventures. The findings are analysed from the lens of structuration theory, recognising both individual and structural level barriers to equity. We conclude by discussing implications for overcoming structural-based gender differences in areas such as public policy, the education system, scholarship, and professional associations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Social Entrepreneurship Taylor & Francis

Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups

Gendered Disparities in Funding for Non-Profit, Hybrid, and for-Profit Start-Ups

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Volume OnlineFirst: 14 – Dec 2, 2022

Abstract

Abstract This study addresses a scholarship need to use more gender-conscious, structuration theory to explore the investment funding ecosystem on start-up social enterprises. The paper examines gendered disparities in start-up equity funding available to non-profit, for-profit, and hybrid social ventures, and amongst ventures with and without invention-based technologies. Analysis consists of 17,440 start-up ventures that applied to the Global Accelerator Learning Initiative (GALI) between 2013 and 2019, and quantitatively tests three hypotheses. These hypotheses suggest differences across (1) the gender composition of founder teams and venture type; (2) equity funding available by gender and across venture types; and (3) gendered differences between invention-based ventures. The findings are analysed from the lens of structuration theory, recognising both individual and structural level barriers to equity. We conclude by discussing implications for overcoming structural-based gender differences in areas such as public policy, the education system, scholarship, and professional associations.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/gendered-disparities-in-funding-for-non-profit-hybrid-and-for-profit-0D1v1ZVh9Y

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN
1942-0684
eISSN
1942-0676
DOI
10.1080/19420676.2022.2143871
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract This study addresses a scholarship need to use more gender-conscious, structuration theory to explore the investment funding ecosystem on start-up social enterprises. The paper examines gendered disparities in start-up equity funding available to non-profit, for-profit, and hybrid social ventures, and amongst ventures with and without invention-based technologies. Analysis consists of 17,440 start-up ventures that applied to the Global Accelerator Learning Initiative (GALI) between 2013 and 2019, and quantitatively tests three hypotheses. These hypotheses suggest differences across (1) the gender composition of founder teams and venture type; (2) equity funding available by gender and across venture types; and (3) gendered differences between invention-based ventures. The findings are analysed from the lens of structuration theory, recognising both individual and structural level barriers to equity. We conclude by discussing implications for overcoming structural-based gender differences in areas such as public policy, the education system, scholarship, and professional associations.

Journal

Journal of Social EntrepreneurshipTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 2, 2022

Keywords: Equity financing; gender equality; gender disparities; structuration theory; social enterprise

References