Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Givenness revisited indefinite one-anaphora in unscripted Danish dialogue

Givenness revisited indefinite one-anaphora in unscripted Danish dialogue Abstract Indefinite one-anaphors (e.g. one as in “Phil gave Bob a doughnut because he asked for one”) are at the same time pronominal and indefinite. It is investigated in a small corpus study of unscripted spoken Danish dialogue whether referents of indefinite one-anaphors are as accessible as referents of definite pronouns, and whether they differ in identifiability from referents of definite pronouns. The results suggest that referents of indefinite one-anaphors indeed have approximately the same degree of accessibility as referents of (accented) definite pronouns, but differ with respect to identifiability. These results support a new model of givenness in terms of a multidimensional functional map. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Taylor & Francis

Givenness revisited indefinite one-anaphora in unscripted Danish dialogue

30 pages

Givenness revisited indefinite one-anaphora in unscripted Danish dialogue

Abstract

Abstract Indefinite one-anaphors (e.g. one as in “Phil gave Bob a doughnut because he asked for one”) are at the same time pronominal and indefinite. It is investigated in a small corpus study of unscripted spoken Danish dialogue whether referents of indefinite one-anaphors are as accessible as referents of definite pronouns, and whether they differ in identifiability from referents of definite pronouns. The results suggest that referents of indefinite one-anaphors indeed have...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/givenness-revisited-indefinite-one-anaphora-in-unscripted-danish-etqZh0a4x0
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1949-0763
eISSN
0374-0463
DOI
10.1080/03740463.2007.10414605
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Indefinite one-anaphors (e.g. one as in “Phil gave Bob a doughnut because he asked for one”) are at the same time pronominal and indefinite. It is investigated in a small corpus study of unscripted spoken Danish dialogue whether referents of indefinite one-anaphors are as accessible as referents of definite pronouns, and whether they differ in identifiability from referents of definite pronouns. The results suggest that referents of indefinite one-anaphors indeed have approximately the same degree of accessibility as referents of (accented) definite pronouns, but differ with respect to identifiability. These results support a new model of givenness in terms of a multidimensional functional map.

Journal

Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: InternationalTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.