Abstract
AbstractThis essay argues that the use of the censor's bleep for comedic effect in cases when an actual expletive is not present (what is known as “unnecessary censorship”) can contribute not only to our understanding of traditional theories of humor but also uncover a deep connection between censorship, humor, and human speech. The essay begins with a description of the phenomenon of “unnecessary censorship” within the context of prime-time television and the...
AbstractThis essay argues that the use of the censor's bleep for comedic effect in cases when an actual expletive is not present (what is known as “unnecessary censorship”) can contribute not only to our understanding of traditional theories of humor but also uncover a deep connection between censorship, humor, and human speech. The essay begins with a description of the phenomenon of “unnecessary censorship” within the context of prime-time television and the growing use of profane and indecent language. To understand why unnecessary censorship works as a comedic device in light of increasing expletive use (bleeped and unbleeped), the author examines major theories of humor from Bergson, Morreall, Monro, and Critchley, and applies them to the various ways in which the censor's bleep is deployed. This analysis leads the author to consider how the origin of human speech might entail an original act of censoring that is essential to acts of free speech. The author concludes by highlighting how the censor's bleep can be utilized positively within the context of humor, with the effect of exposing and undermining abuses of power and restrictions on human freedom.
Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jul 2, 2016
Keywords: censorship; humor; television comedy; unnecessary censorship
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.