Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hard and soft revisited

Hard and soft revisited In the postscript to The Social Logic of Space (1984), Bill Hillier and Julienne Hanson argue that there are two versions of modernism in urban space: hard and soft. The former invests in continuity and density of the urban fabric, but with a proliferation of barriers resulting in labyrinthine schemes typical of housing estates. The latter invests in distances, discontinuities, sprawl and vast tracts of open unoccupied land. Brazil’s federal capital, Brasília, presents both versions. Over time, the hard version became predominant in the gated communities of satellite dormitory nuclei; the soft version materialized in the Pilot Plan designed by Lucio Costa. Hard parallels deserted public spaces; soft teems with life and is accordingly highly praised by inhabitants. This flatly contradicts the tenets of the critical international literature on Brasília. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Area Development and Policy Taylor & Francis

Hard and soft revisited

Area Development and Policy , Volume 5 (2): 27 – Apr 2, 2020

Hard and soft revisited

Abstract

In the postscript to The Social Logic of Space (1984), Bill Hillier and Julienne Hanson argue that there are two versions of modernism in urban space: hard and soft. The former invests in continuity and density of the urban fabric, but with a proliferation of barriers resulting in labyrinthine schemes typical of housing estates. The latter invests in distances, discontinuities, sprawl and vast tracts of open unoccupied land. Brazil’s federal capital, Brasília, presents both...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/hard-and-soft-revisited-a3YOHEHAI2
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2019 Regional Studies Association
ISSN
2379-2957
eISSN
2379-2949
DOI
10.1080/23792949.2019.1694847
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In the postscript to The Social Logic of Space (1984), Bill Hillier and Julienne Hanson argue that there are two versions of modernism in urban space: hard and soft. The former invests in continuity and density of the urban fabric, but with a proliferation of barriers resulting in labyrinthine schemes typical of housing estates. The latter invests in distances, discontinuities, sprawl and vast tracts of open unoccupied land. Brazil’s federal capital, Brasília, presents both versions. Over time, the hard version became predominant in the gated communities of satellite dormitory nuclei; the soft version materialized in the Pilot Plan designed by Lucio Costa. Hard parallels deserted public spaces; soft teems with life and is accordingly highly praised by inhabitants. This flatly contradicts the tenets of the critical international literature on Brasília.

Journal

Area Development and PolicyTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 2, 2020

Keywords: Brasília; modern city; satellite nuclei; urban history; space use; 巴西利亚;现代城市;卫星核;城市历史;空间应用; Brasilia; ciudad moderna; núcleos satélite; historia urbana; uso del espacio; Бразилиа; современный город; города-спутники; городская история; использование пространства

References