Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Individual differences in understanding emotion: The role of attachment status and psychological discourse

Individual differences in understanding emotion: The role of attachment status and psychological... Abstract Recent studies have shown how children develop an understanding of emotion: pre-school children identify and talk accurately about the basic emotions and increasingly appreciate the way that desires and beliefs give rise to those emotions. However, children also display stable individual differences in their understanding. Two different interpretations of such individual differences are discussed. Caregivers show more or less sensitivity to their children's emotions. One interpretation, therefore, is that early variation in caregiver sensitivity is responsible for individual differences in children's attachment status; in turn, children's attachment status leads to enduring differences in their understanding of emotion. A second interpretation focuses on the fact that children grow up in families that vary in the manner and extent to which feelings are put into words. Accordingly, early differences in family discourse about emotion, especially on the part of the primary caregiver, may lead to variation among children in their understanding of emotion. Evidence supporting or undermining these two different interpretations is reviewed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Attachment & Human Development Taylor & Francis

Individual differences in understanding emotion: The role of attachment status and psychological discourse

Harris, Paul L.
Attachment & Human Development , Volume 1 (3): 18 – Dec 1, 1999
Download PDF
18 pages

Individual differences in understanding emotion: The role of attachment status and psychological discourse

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies have shown how children develop an understanding of emotion: pre-school children identify and talk accurately about the basic emotions and increasingly appreciate the way that desires and beliefs give rise to those emotions. However, children also display stable individual differences in their understanding. Two different interpretations of such individual differences are discussed. Caregivers show more or less sensitivity to their children's emotions. One...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/individual-differences-in-understanding-emotion-the-role-of-attachment-36G8lvStbg
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1469-2988
eISSN
1461-6734
DOI
10.1080/14616739900134171
pmid
11708229
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies have shown how children develop an understanding of emotion: pre-school children identify and talk accurately about the basic emotions and increasingly appreciate the way that desires and beliefs give rise to those emotions. However, children also display stable individual differences in their understanding. Two different interpretations of such individual differences are discussed. Caregivers show more or less sensitivity to their children's emotions. One interpretation, therefore, is that early variation in caregiver sensitivity is responsible for individual differences in children's attachment status; in turn, children's attachment status leads to enduring differences in their understanding of emotion. A second interpretation focuses on the fact that children grow up in families that vary in the manner and extent to which feelings are put into words. Accordingly, early differences in family discourse about emotion, especially on the part of the primary caregiver, may lead to variation among children in their understanding of emotion. Evidence supporting or undermining these two different interpretations is reviewed.

Journal

Attachment & Human Development – Taylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 1999

Keywords: attachment status model; caregiver sensitivity; family environment; psychological discourse model

There are no references for this article.