Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

‘It's a thin line between love and hate’: Why cultural studies is so ‘naff‘ 1

‘It's a thin line between love and hate’: Why cultural studies is so ‘naff‘ 1 nce upon a time intellectuals knew where they stood with regard to popu- lar culture. For those on the left, it was pas- sive and distracting, the vehicle for the transmission of those myths, values and tra- ditions with which the dominant class sought to infect other classes in order to ensure its hegemony; while for the conserv- gary hall ative defenders of Culture with a capital 'C, it was simply barbaric and banal, evidence of a process of Americanization and levelling down which was increasingly coming to 'IT'S A THIN LINE threaten the continuity of culture and tradi- tion. And that is how it was in the years BETWEEN LOVE before cultural studies — or so the story goes. AND HATE' Then, very gradually (although looking back it seemed to happen almost overnight - as if why cultural studies a group of intellectuals got together some- where and finally admitted to having been is so 'naff'1 Barry White fans all along), a different atti- tude began to take shape. Reacting in part against what they saw as an elitist and pes- simistic dismissal of popular culture, and in tial of Albert Steptoe and The Two particular the kind http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities Taylor & Francis

‘It's a thin line between love and hate’: Why cultural studies is so ‘naff‘ 1

Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities , Volume 2 (2): 22 – Jan 1, 1997
22 pages

‘It's a thin line between love and hate’: Why cultural studies is so ‘naff‘ 1

Abstract

nce upon a time intellectuals knew where they stood with regard to popu- lar culture. For those on the left, it was pas- sive and distracting, the vehicle for the transmission of those myths, values and tra- ditions with which the dominant class sought to infect other classes in order to ensure its hegemony; while for the conserv- gary hall ative defenders of Culture with a capital 'C, it was simply barbaric and banal, evidence of a process of Americanization and levelling down which was...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/it-apos-s-a-thin-line-between-love-and-hate-why-cultural-studies-is-so-EMhKHIEdSO
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1469-2899
eISSN
0969-725X
DOI
10.1080/09697259708571930
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

nce upon a time intellectuals knew where they stood with regard to popu- lar culture. For those on the left, it was pas- sive and distracting, the vehicle for the transmission of those myths, values and tra- ditions with which the dominant class sought to infect other classes in order to ensure its hegemony; while for the conserv- gary hall ative defenders of Culture with a capital 'C, it was simply barbaric and banal, evidence of a process of Americanization and levelling down which was increasingly coming to 'IT'S A THIN LINE threaten the continuity of culture and tradi- tion. And that is how it was in the years BETWEEN LOVE before cultural studies — or so the story goes. AND HATE' Then, very gradually (although looking back it seemed to happen almost overnight - as if why cultural studies a group of intellectuals got together some- where and finally admitted to having been is so 'naff'1 Barry White fans all along), a different atti- tude began to take shape. Reacting in part against what they saw as an elitist and pes- simistic dismissal of popular culture, and in tial of Albert Steptoe and The Two particular the kind

Journal

Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical HumanitiesTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.