Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Kriging parameter optimisation: global versus local search strategies

Kriging parameter optimisation: global versus local search strategies Kriging methods require parameters to define search strategy (kriging neighbourhood). These parameters affect the precision and accuracy of its estimates. Frequently, the choice of these parameters is merely subjective. Some practitioners prioritise estimates that lead to models with a reduced smoothing effect or a regression slope as close as possible to one. However, it is prevalent to use the same kriging neighbourhood or search strategy for all blocks estimated within a stationary domain. This study presents a contribution that challenges this concept by using a block-by-block optimisation approach focused on the localised kriging parameter optimisation (LKPO) methodology. A comparative study is carried out, and some of the metrics analysed include the kriging efficiency and the slope of regression (typical in optimising methodologies in the mining industry). The results indicate that the LKPO methodology provides more accurate and precise estimates than those based on a global kriging neighbourhood. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Earth Science Taylor & Francis

Kriging parameter optimisation: global versus local search strategies

Kriging parameter optimisation: global versus local search strategies

Abstract

Kriging methods require parameters to define search strategy (kriging neighbourhood). These parameters affect the precision and accuracy of its estimates. Frequently, the choice of these parameters is merely subjective. Some practitioners prioritise estimates that lead to models with a reduced smoothing effect or a regression slope as close as possible to one. However, it is prevalent to use the same kriging neighbourhood or search strategy for all blocks estimated within a stationary...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/kriging-parameter-optimisation-global-versus-local-search-strategies-il9pYiVNLG
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2021 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and The AusIMM
ISSN
2572-6838
eISSN
2572-6846
DOI
10.1080/25726838.2021.1930964
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Kriging methods require parameters to define search strategy (kriging neighbourhood). These parameters affect the precision and accuracy of its estimates. Frequently, the choice of these parameters is merely subjective. Some practitioners prioritise estimates that lead to models with a reduced smoothing effect or a regression slope as close as possible to one. However, it is prevalent to use the same kriging neighbourhood or search strategy for all blocks estimated within a stationary domain. This study presents a contribution that challenges this concept by using a block-by-block optimisation approach focused on the localised kriging parameter optimisation (LKPO) methodology. A comparative study is carried out, and some of the metrics analysed include the kriging efficiency and the slope of regression (typical in optimising methodologies in the mining industry). The results indicate that the LKPO methodology provides more accurate and precise estimates than those based on a global kriging neighbourhood.

Journal

Applied Earth ScienceTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2021

Keywords: Kriging parameters; kriging efficiency; slope of regression; search strategy; kriging neighbourhood

References