Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract Critical writings in the discipline of landscape architecture are becoming more of a commonplace.1 By ‘critical’ writings is meant analyses that question the framework, borders and suppositions of a discipline, and those that refuse to accept that a discipline is ultimately defined by a series of essential and timeless truths which are to be duly discovered in myriad empirical situations. In part, such critical writings have emerged in response to some significant momentum in cultural studies and the philosophy of culture, as these rather loose disciplinary arenas have encountered and engaged theorists in landscape architecture. And perhaps increasingly, critical writings in landscape architecture are responding to work being done in cross-cultural theory that is critical of the universalizing tendencies of much European and American research in non-Western cultures.2
Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes – Taylor & Francis
Published: Sep 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.