Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems

Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems The importance of collaborative approaches to governing social-ecological systems (SES) towards more transformative outcomes is now widely acknowledged. Theoretical and meth- odological frameworks to enable such collaborations are being developed across a range of disciplines. Transdisciplinary approaches are emerging as a key enabler of potentially trans- formative collaborations in SES, particularly where these are characterized by ‘multiple multi- ples’ (e.g. multiple scales, knowledge systems, etc.). A typical approach to studying complex collaborative initiatives across a range of contexts is comparative case study research, often relying on researchers embedded in cases. In this approach, qualitative case studies are coded using predetermined variables (based on ecological, social, and social-ecological features of cases) to enable comparison and cross-case analysis. In our experience, the process of coding qualitative cases into a quantitative analysis framework can be hampered by what we term ‘sticky variables’, i.e. variables which are difficult to code for reasons related to aspects of the intrinsic complexity of social-ecological systems. Based on cases from a range of geographic locations across the Global North and South, we identify sticky variables, and elucidate the reasons for their ‘stickiness’. We propose several ways of working with and learning from sticky variables, and we reflect on theoretical, methodological and reflexive aspects of transdisciplinary research on collaborations. Moreover, we suggest that sticky variables might be ‘flags’ for interesting underlying factors that influence collaboration. We conclude by drawing out recommendations for researchers and practitioners confronted with the complexities and nuances of collaborations in social-ecological systems around the world. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecosystems and People Taylor & Francis

Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems

Download PDF
13 pages

Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems

Abstract

The importance of collaborative approaches to governing social-ecological systems (SES) towards more transformative outcomes is now widely acknowledged. Theoretical and meth- odological frameworks to enable such collaborations are being developed across a range of disciplines. Transdisciplinary approaches are emerging as a key enabler of potentially trans- formative collaborations in SES, particularly where these are characterized by ‘multiple multi- ples’ (e.g. multiple scales,...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/learning-from-sticky-variables-in-cross-case-analyses-of-collaboration-d9a450OOXO
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ISSN
2639-5916
DOI
10.1080/26395916.2023.2187639
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The importance of collaborative approaches to governing social-ecological systems (SES) towards more transformative outcomes is now widely acknowledged. Theoretical and meth- odological frameworks to enable such collaborations are being developed across a range of disciplines. Transdisciplinary approaches are emerging as a key enabler of potentially trans- formative collaborations in SES, particularly where these are characterized by ‘multiple multi- ples’ (e.g. multiple scales, knowledge systems, etc.). A typical approach to studying complex collaborative initiatives across a range of contexts is comparative case study research, often relying on researchers embedded in cases. In this approach, qualitative case studies are coded using predetermined variables (based on ecological, social, and social-ecological features of cases) to enable comparison and cross-case analysis. In our experience, the process of coding qualitative cases into a quantitative analysis framework can be hampered by what we term ‘sticky variables’, i.e. variables which are difficult to code for reasons related to aspects of the intrinsic complexity of social-ecological systems. Based on cases from a range of geographic locations across the Global North and South, we identify sticky variables, and elucidate the reasons for their ‘stickiness’. We propose several ways of working with and learning from sticky variables, and we reflect on theoretical, methodological and reflexive aspects of transdisciplinary research on collaborations. Moreover, we suggest that sticky variables might be ‘flags’ for interesting underlying factors that influence collaboration. We conclude by drawing out recommendations for researchers and practitioners confronted with the complexities and nuances of collaborations in social-ecological systems around the world.

Journal

Ecosystems and People – Taylor & Francis

Published: Dec 31, 2023

Keywords: Nadia Sitas; Social-ecological systems; collaboration; user rights; adaptability; shared vision; trust and social capital; collaborative outcomes

References

  • Case Study of a community stewardship success: the White Mountain Stewardship Contract
  • Towards local governance of marine resources and ecosystems on Easter Island
  • Collaborative governance in theory and practice
  • Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity
  • Practitioner brief on factors for effective environmental management collaboration. Center for behavior, institutions and the environment working paper series
  • A systematic review of core components of effective collaborative governance of social-ecological systems: 22 key criteria building upon Ostrom’s institutional design principles
  • Six modes of co-production for sustainability
  • What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? A comparative study of two cases in Ecuador
  • Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: tools from applied critical realism
  • Navigating multiple tensions for engaged praxis in a complex social-ecological system
  • Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis
  • Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation
  • Trust in anthropology
  • A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management
  • Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions
  • The struggle to govern the commons
  • Broader impacts in conservation research
  • Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate
  • Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons
  • Learning together for and with the martuwarra Fitzroy river
  • Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework
  • What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?
  • Towards qualitative cross case analysis of transformative processes in the face of resource nexus challenges
  • Scale in environmental governance: moving from concepts and cases to consolidation
  • Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
  • Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems
  • A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems
  • Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis
  • Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: a delphi study
  • Adaptive comanagement: a systematic review and analysis
  • Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources
  • Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems
  • Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review
  • Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration
  • Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis
  • Why care about theories? Innovative ways of theorizing in sustainability science
  • Coding Manual: characteristics of collaborative governance
  • On the frontiers of collaboration and conflict: how context influences the success of collaboration
  • Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas
  • Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector
  • Design principles for global commons: natural resources and emerging technologies
  • Collaboration and nested environmental governance: scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation