Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor Dear Editor, a wide variety of other ways. I would welcome With paranoid pugnacity I persistently pursue further suggestions. problems presented in published papers, such as (2) It astonishes me to find that because I re- Mr. Pavlin's Generation Gap. Does the rabbit- ject the word "level" in favour of "kind" in another proof fence make bunnies of us, or does the emu- context, Mrs. Stockbridge assumes that I consider proof fence justify an ostrich-like policy? I see no these words to be synonymous and applies that mention of Western Australia in the paper printed synonymy to the paper under discussion. My in your December issue. original rejection of the word "level" in favour of It may interest members that the first three "kind" was precisely because I do not see the courses (completed in July 1966, 1967 and 1968) words as synonymous. produced twenty-one diplomates, fifteen of whom (3) I find Mrs. Stockbridge's discussion of the are currently working in this State. Thirteen of word "casework" both clarifies and strengthens my the "locals" and four of the diplomates now over- own dislike of the word. She firstly speaks of seas are members of the Western Australian Branch "work http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Social Work Taylor & Francis

Letters to the Editor

Australian Journal of Social Work , Volume 23 (1): 2 – Jan 1, 1970
Download PDF

Letters to the Editor

Abstract

Dear Editor, a wide variety of other ways. I would welcome With paranoid pugnacity I persistently pursue further suggestions. problems presented in published papers, such as (2) It astonishes me to find that because I re- Mr. Pavlin's Generation Gap. Does the rabbit- ject the word "level" in favour of "kind" in another proof fence make bunnies of us, or does the emu- context, Mrs. Stockbridge assumes that I consider proof fence justify an ostrich-like policy? I see no...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/letters-to-the-editor-DS98zpnGog
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
0004-9565
DOI
10.1080/03124077008549290
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Dear Editor, a wide variety of other ways. I would welcome With paranoid pugnacity I persistently pursue further suggestions. problems presented in published papers, such as (2) It astonishes me to find that because I re- Mr. Pavlin's Generation Gap. Does the rabbit- ject the word "level" in favour of "kind" in another proof fence make bunnies of us, or does the emu- context, Mrs. Stockbridge assumes that I consider proof fence justify an ostrich-like policy? I see no these words to be synonymous and applies that mention of Western Australia in the paper printed synonymy to the paper under discussion. My in your December issue. original rejection of the word "level" in favour of It may interest members that the first three "kind" was precisely because I do not see the courses (completed in July 1966, 1967 and 1968) words as synonymous. produced twenty-one diplomates, fifteen of whom (3) I find Mrs. Stockbridge's discussion of the are currently working in this State. Thirteen of word "casework" both clarifies and strengthens my the "locals" and four of the diplomates now over- own dislike of the word. She firstly speaks of seas are members of the Western Australian Branch "work

Journal

Australian Journal of Social Work – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1970

There are no references for this article.