Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Media Performance Assessment in the Public Interest: Principles and Methods

Media Performance Assessment in the Public Interest: Principles and Methods This chapter offers a characterization and an overview of a particular tradition of media research that has been concerned with the assessment of the quality of mass media “performance” according to a number of normative standards relating to different conceptions and perceptions of the “public interest.” Typical features of the research, which has often been related to considerations of media policy and is broadly in line with “social responsibility” media theory, include a posilivislic approach, a preference for objective (generally quantitative) methods, and a focus on media content as the main object of research. A general framework for assessing media performance is constructed in which the main normative criteria deployed are those of independence, diversity, objectivity, solidarity, and cultural quality. These concepts are discussed and alternative possibilities for operationalizing them in empirical research are proposed and evaluated. Aside from reviewing a research tradition, the aim of this chapter is to help solve problems of applying normative ideas in objective assessment procedures. A second, no less important, aim is to contribute to clarity of thought about some normative concepts that are commonly evoked in respect to key roles the mass media play in the public sphere of society. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of the International Communication Association Taylor & Francis

Media Performance Assessment in the Public Interest: Principles and Methods

Download PDF

Media Performance Assessment in the Public Interest: Principles and Methods

Abstract

This chapter offers a characterization and an overview of a particular tradition of media research that has been concerned with the assessment of the quality of mass media “performance” according to a number of normative standards relating to different conceptions and perceptions of the “public interest.” Typical features of the research, which has often been related to considerations of media policy and is broadly in line with “social responsibility” media...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/media-performance-assessment-in-the-public-interest-principles-and-h6M2TicM9g
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 1991 Taylor and Francis Group LLC
ISSN
2380-8977
eISSN
2380-8985
DOI
10.1080/23808985.1991.11678782
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This chapter offers a characterization and an overview of a particular tradition of media research that has been concerned with the assessment of the quality of mass media “performance” according to a number of normative standards relating to different conceptions and perceptions of the “public interest.” Typical features of the research, which has often been related to considerations of media policy and is broadly in line with “social responsibility” media theory, include a posilivislic approach, a preference for objective (generally quantitative) methods, and a focus on media content as the main object of research. A general framework for assessing media performance is constructed in which the main normative criteria deployed are those of independence, diversity, objectivity, solidarity, and cultural quality. These concepts are discussed and alternative possibilities for operationalizing them in empirical research are proposed and evaluated. Aside from reviewing a research tradition, the aim of this chapter is to help solve problems of applying normative ideas in objective assessment procedures. A second, no less important, aim is to contribute to clarity of thought about some normative concepts that are commonly evoked in respect to key roles the mass media play in the public sphere of society.

Journal

Annals of the International Communication Association – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.