Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Not by Bread Alone: Immoderate Politics and the Roots of Suffering

Not by Bread Alone: Immoderate Politics and the Roots of Suffering PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2023, VOL. 34, NO. 1, 17–22 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192643 COMMENTARIES a b c Karl Aquino , Maja Graso , and Stefan Thau a b Marketing and Behavioral Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Organisational Psychology Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Organizational Behavior, INSEAD University, Singapore Baumeister and Bushman (this issue) present a parsimoni- fullest accomplishment” (Fukuyama, 2022, p. 154). We ous explanation for why the conflict between the left and maintain that regardless of which party is in power, it is less right is inevitable, sometimes hostile, and prone to escal- disruptive to society if neither one attempts to steer it in a ation. They propose that one way to reduce the intensity of direction too far from what most people can reasonably the political polarization is for people on the political right endure without becoming existentially threatened, morally and left to accept a turn-taking arrangement. Central to confused, and cynically disengaged from political life. their argument for why alternations in power can be effect- Through political debate and other institutionally mediated processes, a workable society is one that can integrate com- ive for reducing intergroup conflict is that both parties http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Inquiry Taylor & Francis

Not by Bread Alone: Immoderate Politics and the Roots of Suffering

Aquino, Karl; Graso, Maja; Thau, Stefan
Psychological Inquiry , Volume 34 (1): 6 – Jan 2, 2023
Download PDF
6 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/not-by-bread-alone-immoderate-politics-and-the-roots-of-suffering-HbY8lE2pNu

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-7965
eISSN
1047-840X
DOI
10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192643
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2023, VOL. 34, NO. 1, 17–22 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192643 COMMENTARIES a b c Karl Aquino , Maja Graso , and Stefan Thau a b Marketing and Behavioral Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Organisational Psychology Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Organizational Behavior, INSEAD University, Singapore Baumeister and Bushman (this issue) present a parsimoni- fullest accomplishment” (Fukuyama, 2022, p. 154). We ous explanation for why the conflict between the left and maintain that regardless of which party is in power, it is less right is inevitable, sometimes hostile, and prone to escal- disruptive to society if neither one attempts to steer it in a ation. They propose that one way to reduce the intensity of direction too far from what most people can reasonably the political polarization is for people on the political right endure without becoming existentially threatened, morally and left to accept a turn-taking arrangement. Central to confused, and cynically disengaged from political life. their argument for why alternations in power can be effect- Through political debate and other institutionally mediated processes, a workable society is one that can integrate com- ive for reducing intergroup conflict is that both parties

Journal

Psychological Inquiry – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2023

References

  • Tribalism in war and peace: The nature and evolution of ideological epistemology and its significance for modern social science
  • At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives
  • Political sectarianism in America
  • The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations
  • Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization
  • Amazon and Walmart have raked in billions in additional profits during the pandemic, and shared almost none of it with their workers
  • The case for motivated reasoning
  • How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments
  • Myanmar’s troubled history: Coups, military rule, and ethnic conflict
  • Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession
  • Partisan differences in nonpartisan activity: The case of charitable giving
  • Challenges to traditional narratives of intractable conflict decrease ingroup glorification
  • Death and black diamonds: Meaning, mortality, and the meaning maintenance model
  • Challenges in moving toward a more inclusive democracy: Findings from the 2022 American values survey. Public Religion Research Institutes
  • Inclusivity of past collective trauma and its implications for current intractable conflict: The mediating role of moral lessons
  • Hate speech is in the eye of the beholder: The influence of racial attitudes and freedom of speech beliefs on perceptions of racially motivated threats of violence
  • Public interest in having a third major party dips to 56%
  • Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning
  • Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction?: Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems
  • Group-level emotions
  • Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations
  • The perception gap.