Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

(Not) Valuing Care: A Review of Recent Popular Economic Reports on Preschool in the US

(Not) Valuing Care: A Review of Recent Popular Economic Reports on Preschool in the US Abstract Recently, a series of popular economics “Invest in Kids” (IIK) reports in the United States has called for increased investment in children's early education. These national reports articulate a new concept, the “public finance value” of children, and argue for increased investment in preschool because of its positive impact on the long-term fiscal health of the nation. This paper analyzes the IIK reports from 2003–6 to assess their attention to the multidimensional aspects of early care and education (ECE) in the US. Although the reports evaluate increased investment in preschool, they fail to recognize the need for a comprehensive system of ECE that includes support for childcare and the unpaid care and education provided by parents. As a result, the reports undervalue the contributions of women and of the ECE sector itself. Feminist economics offers a broader perspective that would help the IIK authors avoid conceptual traps and recognize the need for more comprehensive reforms. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Feminist Economics Taylor & Francis

(Not) Valuing Care: A Review of Recent Popular Economic Reports on Preschool in the US

Feminist Economics , Volume 15 (2): 23 – Apr 1, 2009
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/not-valuing-care-a-review-of-recent-popular-economic-reports-on-jLh4HKE00N

References (95)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1466-4372
eISSN
1354-5701
DOI
10.1080/13545700802699512
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Recently, a series of popular economics “Invest in Kids” (IIK) reports in the United States has called for increased investment in children's early education. These national reports articulate a new concept, the “public finance value” of children, and argue for increased investment in preschool because of its positive impact on the long-term fiscal health of the nation. This paper analyzes the IIK reports from 2003–6 to assess their attention to the multidimensional aspects of early care and education (ECE) in the US. Although the reports evaluate increased investment in preschool, they fail to recognize the need for a comprehensive system of ECE that includes support for childcare and the unpaid care and education provided by parents. As a result, the reports undervalue the contributions of women and of the ECE sector itself. Feminist economics offers a broader perspective that would help the IIK authors avoid conceptual traps and recognize the need for more comprehensive reforms.

Journal

Feminist EconomicsTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 2009

Keywords: Childcare; fiscal imbalance; economic development; JEL Codes: A13, D1, D3

There are no references for this article.