Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Progress in Communication as a Social Science

Progress in Communication as a Social Science This essay proposes a strategy for achieving coherence in results of communication research: to seek for “dynamics-in-the-large” in a dialectical confrontation between culturally-dominated and genetically-dominated theories of learning how to learn communicative behavior, particularly language. The issue is raised in relation to recent work by K. E. Boulding and E. O. Wilson and is refined by reference to their complementary views on the nature of social evolution, on its dynamics, and on the relation of language to such behaviors as carrying out aggression, enacting ever-increasing division of labor, and practicing religion. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of the International Communication Association Taylor & Francis

Progress in Communication as a Social Science

Progress in Communication as a Social Science

Abstract

This essay proposes a strategy for achieving coherence in results of communication research: to seek for “dynamics-in-the-large” in a dialectical confrontation between culturally-dominated and genetically-dominated theories of learning how to learn communicative behavior, particularly language. The issue is raised in relation to recent work by K. E. Boulding and E. O. Wilson and is refined by reference to their complementary views on the nature of social evolution, on its...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/progress-in-communication-as-a-social-science-aedud4MaIL
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 1980 International Communications Association
ISSN
2380-8977
eISSN
2380-8985
DOI
10.1080/23808985.1980.11923792
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This essay proposes a strategy for achieving coherence in results of communication research: to seek for “dynamics-in-the-large” in a dialectical confrontation between culturally-dominated and genetically-dominated theories of learning how to learn communicative behavior, particularly language. The issue is raised in relation to recent work by K. E. Boulding and E. O. Wilson and is refined by reference to their complementary views on the nature of social evolution, on its dynamics, and on the relation of language to such behaviors as carrying out aggression, enacting ever-increasing division of labor, and practicing religion.

Journal

Annals of the International Communication AssociationTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 1980

References