Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms

Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise... PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2018, VOL. 29, NO. 4, 200–202 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1537315 Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms Brian M. Monroe Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama The target article is a much-needed creative attempt to syn- So, given an attitude about Donald Trump, for example, thesize much of what we know about attitudes into a coher- one’s association of him producing a reliable stream of state- ent framework that is more quantifiable and precise than ments that contradict known facts would have equal weight what has come before. If the field is to make progress in the network (and thus in producing the attitude) with the toward a truly scientific understanding of social cognitive arguably far-less-strongly-related quality that he settled a phenomena, attempts like this are not only desirable but federal lawsuit in the 1970s where he was accused of hous- necessary. Particularly outstanding is the attempt to use ing rental racial discrimination. Both associations might models from other areas of science to describe knowledge ultimately impact one’s attitude toward him to different networks. In more general terms, many phenomena from degrees, but this difference in strength of association simply psychology exhibit http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Inquiry Taylor & Francis

Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms

Psychological Inquiry , Volume 29 (4): 3 – Oct 2, 2018

Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms

Psychological Inquiry , Volume 29 (4): 3 – Oct 2, 2018

Abstract

PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2018, VOL. 29, NO. 4, 200–202 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1537315 Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms Brian M. Monroe Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama The target article is a much-needed creative attempt to syn- So, given an attitude about Donald Trump, for example, thesize much of what we know about attitudes into a coher- one’s association of him producing a reliable stream of state- ent framework that is more quantifiable and precise than ments that contradict known facts would have equal weight what has come before. If the field is to make progress in the network (and thus in producing the attitude) with the toward a truly scientific understanding of social cognitive arguably far-less-strongly-related quality that he settled a phenomena, attempts like this are not only desirable but federal lawsuit in the 1970s where he was accused of hous- necessary. Particularly outstanding is the attempt to use ing rental racial discrimination. Both associations might models from other areas of science to describe knowledge ultimately impact one’s attitude toward him to different networks. In more general terms, many phenomena from degrees, but this difference in strength of association simply psychology exhibit

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/progress-in-understanding-requires-modeling-with-faithfulness-to-the-lJZZ8gJcm1

References (13)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-7965
eISSN
1047-840X
DOI
10.1080/1047840X.2018.1537315
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2018, VOL. 29, NO. 4, 200–202 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1537315 Progress in Understanding Requires Modeling with Faithfulness to the Phenomenon, and Precise Mechanisms Brian M. Monroe Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama The target article is a much-needed creative attempt to syn- So, given an attitude about Donald Trump, for example, thesize much of what we know about attitudes into a coher- one’s association of him producing a reliable stream of state- ent framework that is more quantifiable and precise than ments that contradict known facts would have equal weight what has come before. If the field is to make progress in the network (and thus in producing the attitude) with the toward a truly scientific understanding of social cognitive arguably far-less-strongly-related quality that he settled a phenomena, attempts like this are not only desirable but federal lawsuit in the 1970s where he was accused of hous- necessary. Particularly outstanding is the attempt to use ing rental racial discrimination. Both associations might models from other areas of science to describe knowledge ultimately impact one’s attitude toward him to different networks. In more general terms, many phenomena from degrees, but this difference in strength of association simply psychology exhibit

Journal

Psychological InquiryTaylor & Francis

Published: Oct 2, 2018

There are no references for this article.