Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Public Perception and Understanding of Shark Attack Mitigation Measures in Australia

Public Perception and Understanding of Shark Attack Mitigation Measures in Australia Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a significant and growing problem, with mitigation measures being increasingly dependent on sociopolitical landscapes. We surveyed 766 people from two Australian states to assess their understanding of shark attack mitigation measures. Although beach users were relatively aware of existing mitigation measures, the efficacy of aerial patrol was overestimated, as was the risk of shark attack. The latter, as well as the innate fear of shark attacks, is likely to explain the high level of worry related with shark attack and fits within the affect heuristic that can influence how people respond to risk situations. Beach users did not, however, choose beaches based on existing mitigation measures. Results highlight the need for improved education about the risks of shark attack and for further research into the emotional response from low probability–high consequences incidents. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Dimensions of Wildlife Taylor & Francis

Public Perception and Understanding of Shark Attack Mitigation Measures in Australia

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/public-perception-and-understanding-of-shark-attack-mitigation-ClaJwE2CmZ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1533-158X
eISSN
1087-1209
DOI
10.1080/10871209.2014.844289
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a significant and growing problem, with mitigation measures being increasingly dependent on sociopolitical landscapes. We surveyed 766 people from two Australian states to assess their understanding of shark attack mitigation measures. Although beach users were relatively aware of existing mitigation measures, the efficacy of aerial patrol was overestimated, as was the risk of shark attack. The latter, as well as the innate fear of shark attacks, is likely to explain the high level of worry related with shark attack and fits within the affect heuristic that can influence how people respond to risk situations. Beach users did not, however, choose beaches based on existing mitigation measures. Results highlight the need for improved education about the risks of shark attack and for further research into the emotional response from low probability–high consequences incidents.

Journal

Human Dimensions of Wildlife – Taylor & Francis

Published: Mar 4, 2014

Keywords: human–wildlife conflict; beach meshing; aerial patrols; public awareness; Australia

References

  • Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Primary Industries and Sydney aquarium
  • Factors contributing to shark attacks on humans: A Volusia County, Florida, case study
  • Recommendations for governmental organizations responding to incidents of white shark attacks on humans
  • Toward a comprehensive paradigm of wildlife management: Integrating the human and biological dimensions
  • Human dimensions of living with wildlife – a management challenge for the 21st century
  • Sharks, wildlife tourism, and state regulation
  • Attitudes towards animals: Species ratings
  • Submerged realities: Shark documentaries at depth
  • The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits
  • How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
  • Report into the NSW shark meshing (bather protection) program
  • Mitigating human wildlife conflicts in southern Asia
  • Judged frequency of lethal events
  • Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments
  • Risk as feelings
  • Australian and U.S. news media portrayal of sharks and their conservation
  • Australian beach safety and the politics of shark attacks
  • Why sharks may have nothing more to fear than fear itself: An analysis of the effect of human attitudes on the conservation of the white shark
  • Decadal trends in shark catches and effort from the New South Wales, Australia, Shark Meshing Program, 1950–2010
  • The essence of wildlife management
  • Money, kisses, and electric shocks: An effective psychology or risk
  • Factors in risk perception
  • Perception of risk
  • What’s fear got to do with it? It’s affect we need to worry about
  • Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality
  • Risk perception and affect
  • Probability neglect: Emotions, worst case scenarios, and law
  • Detecting a decline in whale shark sightings in the Andaman Sea, Thailand, using ecotourist operator-collected data
  • Cognitive structure and the affective domain: On knowing and feeling in biology
  • The shark watching industry and its potential contribution to shark conservation
  • Mountain lion and human activities in California: testing speculations
  • Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide
  • Changing patterns of shark attacks in Australian waters
  • The impact of human-wildlife conflict on natural systems
  • Beauty and the beast: Preferences for animals in Australia
  • But are tourists satisfied? Importance-performance analysis of the whale shark tourism industry on Isla Holbox, Mexico