Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Punishment for child abuse in South Korea: Cases of child-abuse deaths before and after new law

Punishment for child abuse in South Korea: Cases of child-abuse deaths before and after new law This study aimed to identify the trend of judicial decisions on child abuse deaths in South Korea and provide practical implications to improve the current child welfare legislation (the Child Abuse Act or the CAA). The present study investigated factors related to sentencing decisions for child abuse deaths between 2000 and 2013 (45 cases before the CAA) and between 2014 and 2017 (20 cases after the CAA). This study used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine whether there were differences in judicial decisions before and after the CAA. The results showed that the sentencing standard has become stricter following the enactment of the CAA; however, sentences have still been primarily guided by judicial discretion. The current study suggests that it is important to amend the current CAA to clarify sentencing standards for child abuse. This amendment can ensure that punishment is primarily determined by specific provisions of the law. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development Taylor & Francis

Punishment for child abuse in South Korea: Cases of child-abuse deaths before and after new law

Punishment for child abuse in South Korea: Cases of child-abuse deaths before and after new law

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the trend of judicial decisions on child abuse deaths in South Korea and provide practical implications to improve the current child welfare legislation (the Child Abuse Act or the CAA). The present study investigated factors related to sentencing decisions for child abuse deaths between 2000 and 2013 (45 cases before the CAA) and between 2014 and 2017 (20 cases after the CAA). This study used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine whether there were...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/punishment-for-child-abuse-in-south-korea-cases-of-child-abuse-deaths-t6APot3xn0
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2022 Department of Social Work, National University of Singapore, Singapore
ISSN
2165-0993
eISSN
0218-5385
DOI
10.1080/02185385.2022.2059550
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the trend of judicial decisions on child abuse deaths in South Korea and provide practical implications to improve the current child welfare legislation (the Child Abuse Act or the CAA). The present study investigated factors related to sentencing decisions for child abuse deaths between 2000 and 2013 (45 cases before the CAA) and between 2014 and 2017 (20 cases after the CAA). This study used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine whether there were differences in judicial decisions before and after the CAA. The results showed that the sentencing standard has become stricter following the enactment of the CAA; however, sentences have still been primarily guided by judicial discretion. The current study suggests that it is important to amend the current CAA to clarify sentencing standards for child abuse. This amendment can ensure that punishment is primarily determined by specific provisions of the law.

Journal

Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and DevelopmentTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2023

Keywords: Child abuse deaths; Child Abuse Act; judicial decisions; QCA method; judicial discretion

References