Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Starke (2018)
Pariahs No More? On the Status of Theory and Theorists in Contemporary Public AdministrationAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 40
C. Stivers (2000)
Resisting the Ascendancy of Public Management: Normative Theory and Public AdministrationAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 22
Aristotle, H. Rackham (1990)
THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
Laura Hand (2019)
A Virtuous Hearer: An Exploration of Epistemic Injustice and an Ethic of Care in Public EncountersAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 43
(2020)
From false empathy to honest engagement: Bridging
P. Sabatier (1986)
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested SynthesisJournal of Public Policy, 6
T. Moynihan (2019)
Spinal Catastrophism: A Secret History
R. D'amico (1978)
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the PrisonTelos, 1978
H. Carr
Tractatus Logico-PhilosophicusNature, 111
J. Dryzek (2000)
Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations
F. Nicoll (2010)
Race and Epistemologies of IgnoranceSocial Epistemology, 24
Sylvère Lotringer, Chet Wiener, E. Wittman (2009)
Soft Subversions: Texts and Interviews 1977–1985
Hanina Ben-Menahem (2008)
Is Talmudic Law a Religious Legal System? A Provisional AnalysisThe journal of law and religion, 24
James Bernauer, D. Rasmussen (1987)
The final Foucault
C. Stivers (1994)
The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public AdministrationPublic Administration Review, 54
(2013)
Defining and evaluating quality in ethnographic
T. Zuberi, E. Bonilla-Silva (2008)
White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology
J. Raadschelders (2005)
Government and Public Administration: Challenges to and Need For Connecting KnowledgeAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 27
Konstantinos Kerasovitis (2020)
Posthuman knowledgeInformation, Communication & Society, 23
M. Fricker (2013)
Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom?Synthese, 190
Norma Riccucci (2010)
Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge
(1996)
Round # 1 : What do we mean when we say “ real ” in public affairs : The modern / postmodern distinction
M. Bevir (2013)
A Theory of Governance
R. House, E. Araral (2012)
The institutional analysis and development framework
Sara Ruddick (1989)
Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace
A. Cunliffe (2003)
Intersubjective Voices: The Role of the “Theorist”Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25
James Cook (2014)
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
R. fornet-betancourt, H. Becker, alfredo gomez-müller, J. Gauthier (1987)
the ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedomPhilosophy & Social Criticism, 12
Barbara Pini, B. Pease (2013)
Men, masculinities and methodologies
G. Deleuze, Constantin Boundas (1991)
Empiricism and subjectivity : an essay on Hume's theory of human nature
J. Baldwin (1961)
Nobody knows my name : more notes of a native son
(2005)
To kill the king: Post-traditional governance and bureaucracy
Mark Vagle (2010)
Re‐framing Schön's call for a phenomenology of practice: a post‐intentional approachReflective Practice, 11
Aristotle (2000)
364
Lonnie Schaible, L. Dwight, Nuri Heckler (2020)
The Influence of Spatial Density of Nonprofits on CrimeUrban Affairs Review, 57
(2012)
Boundas, Trans.)
Katherine Dormandy (2018)
Does Epistemic Humility Threaten Religious Beliefs?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 46
R. Bogumil (1985)
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in actionProceedings of the IEEE, 73
G. Sartori (1984)
Social science concepts
Brandi Blessett (2018)
Rethinking the Administrative State Through an Intersectional FrameworkAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 42
C. Stivers (2008)
Governance in Dark Times: Practical Philosophy for Public Service
D. Farmer (2006)
Imagine! Preface to the Post-TraditionalAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 28
Gary Goertz (2005)
Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide
Abstract When theorizing, it is sometimes colloquially said “I reckon…” This essay attempts to reckon with theorizing by proposing a heuristic for systematically gauging rigorous and/or meaningful theoretical research with the analysis of eight factors: novelty, challenge, relevance, power, fecundity, usefulness, deliberateness, and clarity. These factors offer a manual for theorists writing theoretical research, and a loose set of considerations to begin discussions of what it is that makes invigorating theory.
Administrative Theory & Praxis – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 2, 2023
Keywords: Methodology; public administration; theoretical research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.