Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reliance on Informants in Wildlife Management Situation Analysis—Shortcut or Shortcoming?

Reliance on Informants in Wildlife Management Situation Analysis—Shortcut or Shortcoming? Wildlife managers conducting situation analyses typically turn to key informants to gain insight into community experiences and opinions. Although expedient, relying only on informants has shortcomings. We examined informants as potential sources of information about community residents with respect to human–coyote issues in Westchester County, New York. We employed a mixed-method approach that included both interviews with informants (n = 40) and a telephone survey of residents (n = 1,160). Although we found agreement on some measures, disparities between key informants' and residents' perceptions of coyotes in the community were revealed, suggesting caution about reliance on informants to guide management decisions. This study highlights the value of multiple data sources to improve insight and increase confidence in efforts to assess community perspectives regarding suburban wildlife issues. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Dimensions of Wildlife Taylor & Francis

Reliance on Informants in Wildlife Management Situation Analysis—Shortcut or Shortcoming?

12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/reliance-on-informants-in-wildlife-management-situation-analysis-gu327hZeLq

References (14)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1533-158X
eISSN
1087-1209
DOI
10.1080/10871200802427964
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Wildlife managers conducting situation analyses typically turn to key informants to gain insight into community experiences and opinions. Although expedient, relying only on informants has shortcomings. We examined informants as potential sources of information about community residents with respect to human–coyote issues in Westchester County, New York. We employed a mixed-method approach that included both interviews with informants (n = 40) and a telephone survey of residents (n = 1,160). Although we found agreement on some measures, disparities between key informants' and residents' perceptions of coyotes in the community were revealed, suggesting caution about reliance on informants to guide management decisions. This study highlights the value of multiple data sources to improve insight and increase confidence in efforts to assess community perspectives regarding suburban wildlife issues.

Journal

Human Dimensions of WildlifeTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 3, 2008

Keywords: coyote; human–wildlife interactions; informants; situation analysis; wildlife management

There are no references for this article.