Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kathleen Blanchard (2000)
Rachel Carson and the human dimensions of fish and wildlife managementHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 5
Lisa Chase, W. Siemer, D. Decker (2002)
Designing stakeholder involvement strategies to resolve wildlife management controversiesWildlife Society Bulletin, 30
J. Enck, D. Decker (1997)
Examining assumptions in wildlife management: A contribution of human dimensions inquiryHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 2
D. Decker, J. Enck (1996)
Human dimensions of wildlife management: Knowledge for agency survival in the 21st centuryHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 1
T. Clark, A. Curlee, R. Reading (1996)
Crafting Effective Solutions to the Large Carnivore Conservation ProblemConservation Biology, 10
Joanne Vining, Angela Ebreo (1991)
Are You Thinking What I Think You Are? A Study of Actual and Estimated Goal Priorities and Decision Preferences of Resource Managers, Environmentalists, and the PublicSociety & Natural Resources, 4
D. Decker, Lisa Chase (1997)
HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF LIVING WITH WILDLIFE : A MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE FOR THE 21ST CENTURYWildlife Society Bulletin, 25
T. Heberlein, G. Ericsson (2005)
Ties to the Countryside: Accounting for Urbanites Attitudes toward Hunting, Wolves, and WildlifeHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 10
K. Miller, C. McGee (2001)
Toward Incorporating Human Dimensions Information into Wildlife Management Decision-MakingHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 6
K. Gundry, T. Heberlein (1984)
Research Report: Do Public Meetings Represent the Public?Journal of The American Planning Association, 50
N. Burkardt, Phadrea Ponds (2006)
Using Role Analysis to Plan for Stakeholder Involvement: A Wyoming Case Study, 34
M. Patton (1980)
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
S. Riley, W. Siemer, D. Decker, L. Carpenter, J. Organ, Louis Berchielli (2003)
Adaptive Impact Management: An Integrative Approach to Wildlife ManagementHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 8
A. Strauss, B. Glaser (1967)
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Wildlife managers conducting situation analyses typically turn to key informants to gain insight into community experiences and opinions. Although expedient, relying only on informants has shortcomings. We examined informants as potential sources of information about community residents with respect to human–coyote issues in Westchester County, New York. We employed a mixed-method approach that included both interviews with informants (n = 40) and a telephone survey of residents (n = 1,160). Although we found agreement on some measures, disparities between key informants' and residents' perceptions of coyotes in the community were revealed, suggesting caution about reliance on informants to guide management decisions. This study highlights the value of multiple data sources to improve insight and increase confidence in efforts to assess community perspectives regarding suburban wildlife issues.
Human Dimensions of Wildlife – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 3, 2008
Keywords: coyote; human–wildlife interactions; informants; situation analysis; wildlife management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.