Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Resources and Partisanship: Response to Commentaries

Resources and Partisanship: Response to Commentaries PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2023, VOL. 34, NO. 1, 47–51 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192654 REPLY a b Roy F. Baumeister and Brad J. Bushman a b School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA “… I suppose what we all desire is to improve the condition of ways that politicians on the left and on the right might the people by whom we are employed, and to advance our come to disagree more respectfully. country, or at any rate to save it from retrogression.” The alternative suggested by Aquino et al. (this issue) is “That of course.” moderation. We like that too. If politicians of all stripes could be encouraged to “chill out” and accept moderate “So much is of course. I give credit to my opponents in Parliament for that desire quite as readily as I do to my views, then perhaps destructive extremes could be avoided. colleagues or to myself. The idea that political virtue is all on Yet how to achieve it? Again, we were not advocating struc- one side is both mischievous and absurd. We allow ourselves to tural change to increase alternation and/or sharing of power, talk in that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Inquiry Taylor & Francis

Resources and Partisanship: Response to Commentaries

Baumeister, Roy F.; Bushman, Brad J.
Psychological Inquiry , Volume 34 (1): 5 – Jan 2, 2023
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/resources-and-partisanship-response-to-commentaries-u3400bIeB0

References (11)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
ISSN
1532-7965
eISSN
1047-840X
DOI
10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192654
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2023, VOL. 34, NO. 1, 47–51 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2192654 REPLY a b Roy F. Baumeister and Brad J. Bushman a b School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA “… I suppose what we all desire is to improve the condition of ways that politicians on the left and on the right might the people by whom we are employed, and to advance our come to disagree more respectfully. country, or at any rate to save it from retrogression.” The alternative suggested by Aquino et al. (this issue) is “That of course.” moderation. We like that too. If politicians of all stripes could be encouraged to “chill out” and accept moderate “So much is of course. I give credit to my opponents in Parliament for that desire quite as readily as I do to my views, then perhaps destructive extremes could be avoided. colleagues or to myself. The idea that political virtue is all on Yet how to achieve it? Again, we were not advocating struc- one side is both mischievous and absurd. We allow ourselves to tural change to increase alternation and/or sharing of power, talk in that

Journal

Psychological Inquiry – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2023

There are no references for this article.