Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/taylor-francis/risk-perception-as-a-factor-in-wildlife-stakeholder-acceptance-AMhLmKCzlZ
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Copyright
- Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
- ISSN
- 1533-158X
- eISSN
- 1087-1209
- DOI
- 10.1080/10871200009359187
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Abstract The increased frequency of cougar attacks on humans throughout western North America has created a daunting challenge for wildlife managers concerned about sustainable coexistence of humans and large carnivores. A mail back questionnaire (n = 805) measured wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity (WSAC) for cougars in Montana and improved understanding of how cognitive and affective risk perceptions affect WSAC. Respondents who reported a lower WSAC, inferred by a preference for a decrease in cougar populations, perceived significantly greater risks and a higher proportion worried about problems from cougars than respondents who preferred stable or increasing populations. Cognitive risk perception greatly exceeded estimates of actual risks indicated by objective analysis. These results present the possibility that WSAC can be modified for cougars, and presumably other large carnivores, through management actions and communication that affect perceptions of risk to humans.
Journal
Human Dimensions of Wildlife – Taylor & Francis
Published: Sep 1, 2000
Keywords: Cougars; human dimensions; Puma concolor; risk perception; wildlife management; wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity