Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Science and the Reformulated Learned-Helplessness Model of Depression

Science and the Reformulated Learned-Helplessness Model of Depression 14 COMMENTARIES Craig A. Anderson and William E. Deuser University of Missouri, Columbia Concurrent with the publication of the reformulated model points needing attention in this area. Thus, we first list points (RM) of learned helplessness (LH) and depression (Abram- on which we are in substantial agreement with Peterson. Then, we tackle in more detail those that need further thought son, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978), Costello (1978) warned and refinement. Finally, we briefly mention several smaller about a bandwagon effect among depression researchers, points of contention. who had seemingly adopted the LH approach with relatively little scrutiny of the theory or data (see also Rippere, 1977). Points of Agreement Although those original fears of a bandwagon effect were directed at the original LH model rather than the attributional Historical or Cultural Limitations one, it is now apparent that this warning applies equally to the new version. RM. We can think of no maior area of It seems unlikely that any culture or historical period has research in which the theory and the data purpo';tedly sup- ever existed in which causal explanation was not a major part porting the theory are as unrelated as in studies of the LH of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Inquiry Taylor & Francis

Science and the Reformulated Learned-Helplessness Model of Depression

Psychological Inquiry , Volume 2 (1): 6 – Jan 1, 1991

Science and the Reformulated Learned-Helplessness Model of Depression

Psychological Inquiry , Volume 2 (1): 6 – Jan 1, 1991

Abstract

14 COMMENTARIES Craig A. Anderson and William E. Deuser University of Missouri, Columbia Concurrent with the publication of the reformulated model points needing attention in this area. Thus, we first list points (RM) of learned helplessness (LH) and depression (Abram- on which we are in substantial agreement with Peterson. Then, we tackle in more detail those that need further thought son, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978), Costello (1978) warned and refinement. Finally, we briefly mention several smaller about a bandwagon effect among depression researchers, points of contention. who had seemingly adopted the LH approach with relatively little scrutiny of the theory or data (see also Rippere, 1977). Points of Agreement Although those original fears of a bandwagon effect were directed at the original LH model rather than the attributional Historical or Cultural Limitations one, it is now apparent that this warning applies equally to the new version. RM. We can think of no maior area of It seems unlikely that any culture or historical period has research in which the theory and the data purpo';tedly sup- ever existed in which causal explanation was not a major part porting the theory are as unrelated as in studies of the LH of

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/science-and-the-reformulated-learned-helplessness-model-of-depression-BhVerItlF0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-7965
eISSN
1047-840X
DOI
10.1207/s15327965pli0201_3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

14 COMMENTARIES Craig A. Anderson and William E. Deuser University of Missouri, Columbia Concurrent with the publication of the reformulated model points needing attention in this area. Thus, we first list points (RM) of learned helplessness (LH) and depression (Abram- on which we are in substantial agreement with Peterson. Then, we tackle in more detail those that need further thought son, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978), Costello (1978) warned and refinement. Finally, we briefly mention several smaller about a bandwagon effect among depression researchers, points of contention. who had seemingly adopted the LH approach with relatively little scrutiny of the theory or data (see also Rippere, 1977). Points of Agreement Although those original fears of a bandwagon effect were directed at the original LH model rather than the attributional Historical or Cultural Limitations one, it is now apparent that this warning applies equally to the new version. RM. We can think of no maior area of It seems unlikely that any culture or historical period has research in which the theory and the data purpo';tedly sup- ever existed in which causal explanation was not a major part porting the theory are as unrelated as in studies of the LH of

Journal

Psychological InquiryTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.