Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Simple Addition Strategies in a First-Grade Class With Multiple Strategy Instruction

Simple Addition Strategies in a First-Grade Class With Multiple Strategy Instruction In this study, we investigated the fluency with which first graders of different mathematical achievement levels applied multiple, school-taught strategies for finding arithmetic sums over 10. We characterized children's strategies with the 4 parameters of Lemaire and Siegler's (1995) model of strategy change (strategy repertoire, distribution, efficiency, and selection) using the choice/no-choice method (Siegler & Lemaire, 1997). Eighty-three first graders who had been taught 2 reasoning strategies (decomposition-to-10 and tie) solved a series of near ties over 10 (such as 8 + 7 = .) in 4 different conditions. In the choice condition, children could choose between the decomposition-to-10 and the tie strategy on each near tie. In the 3 no-choice conditions, they had to solve all sums with decomposition-to-10, tie, and retrieval strategies, respectively. High-achieving first graders applied these strategies more efficiently but not more adaptively than did their lower achieving peers. We interpret these results in light of international reform mathematics efforts to promote children's adaptive expertise. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cognition and Instruction Taylor & Francis

Simple Addition Strategies in a First-Grade Class With Multiple Strategy Instruction

21 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/simple-addition-strategies-in-a-first-grade-class-with-multiple-8PivnHInr0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-690X
eISSN
0737-0008
DOI
10.1207/s1532690xci2301_1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the fluency with which first graders of different mathematical achievement levels applied multiple, school-taught strategies for finding arithmetic sums over 10. We characterized children's strategies with the 4 parameters of Lemaire and Siegler's (1995) model of strategy change (strategy repertoire, distribution, efficiency, and selection) using the choice/no-choice method (Siegler & Lemaire, 1997). Eighty-three first graders who had been taught 2 reasoning strategies (decomposition-to-10 and tie) solved a series of near ties over 10 (such as 8 + 7 = .) in 4 different conditions. In the choice condition, children could choose between the decomposition-to-10 and the tie strategy on each near tie. In the 3 no-choice conditions, they had to solve all sums with decomposition-to-10, tie, and retrieval strategies, respectively. High-achieving first graders applied these strategies more efficiently but not more adaptively than did their lower achieving peers. We interpret these results in light of international reform mathematics efforts to promote children's adaptive expertise.

Journal

Cognition and InstructionTaylor & Francis

Published: Mar 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.