Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
In this study, we investigated the fluency with which first graders of different mathematical achievement levels applied multiple, school-taught strategies for finding arithmetic sums over 10. We characterized children's strategies with the 4 parameters of Lemaire and Siegler's (1995) model of strategy change (strategy repertoire, distribution, efficiency, and selection) using the choice/no-choice method (Siegler & Lemaire, 1997). Eighty-three first graders who had been taught 2 reasoning strategies (decomposition-to-10 and tie) solved a series of near ties over 10 (such as 8 + 7 = .) in 4 different conditions. In the choice condition, children could choose between the decomposition-to-10 and the tie strategy on each near tie. In the 3 no-choice conditions, they had to solve all sums with decomposition-to-10, tie, and retrieval strategies, respectively. High-achieving first graders applied these strategies more efficiently but not more adaptively than did their lower achieving peers. We interpret these results in light of international reform mathematics efforts to promote children's adaptive expertise.
Cognition and Instruction – Taylor & Francis
Published: Mar 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.