Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Situational Effects of Task and Gender on Nonverbal Display

Situational Effects of Task and Gender on Nonverbal Display This study examines the impact of sex, psychological gender, and task on ten nonverbal conversational dominance and listener attentiveness cues. Results of a repeated measure analysis on task demonstrate that subjects, in general, use more warmth-attentiveness cues on the feminine task and more conversational control cues on the masculine one. But androgynous males adapted nonverbal cues to fit task demands, while androgynous females remained constant in frequency of cues between task situations. Masculine males, however, were more controlling on the feminine than on the masculine task, while sex-typed females were more expressive on the feminine than on the masculine task. Correlations among nonverbal acts demonstrate that cues cluster into listener behaviors and body movement or speaker acts and that the same subjects employ different patterns across task situations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of the International Communication Association Taylor & Francis

Situational Effects of Task and Gender on Nonverbal Display

Situational Effects of Task and Gender on Nonverbal Display

Annals of the International Communication Association , Volume 4 (1): 19 – Dec 1, 1980

Abstract

This study examines the impact of sex, psychological gender, and task on ten nonverbal conversational dominance and listener attentiveness cues. Results of a repeated measure analysis on task demonstrate that subjects, in general, use more warmth-attentiveness cues on the feminine task and more conversational control cues on the masculine one. But androgynous males adapted nonverbal cues to fit task demands, while androgynous females remained constant in frequency of cues between task situations. Masculine males, however, were more controlling on the feminine than on the masculine task, while sex-typed females were more expressive on the feminine than on the masculine task. Correlations among nonverbal acts demonstrate that cues cluster into listener behaviors and body movement or speaker acts and that the same subjects employ different patterns across task situations.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/situational-effects-of-task-and-gender-on-nonverbal-display-6rWtkG0eL3

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 1980 International Communications Association
ISSN
2380-8977
eISSN
2380-8985
DOI
10.1080/23808985.1980.11923832
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study examines the impact of sex, psychological gender, and task on ten nonverbal conversational dominance and listener attentiveness cues. Results of a repeated measure analysis on task demonstrate that subjects, in general, use more warmth-attentiveness cues on the feminine task and more conversational control cues on the masculine one. But androgynous males adapted nonverbal cues to fit task demands, while androgynous females remained constant in frequency of cues between task situations. Masculine males, however, were more controlling on the feminine than on the masculine task, while sex-typed females were more expressive on the feminine than on the masculine task. Correlations among nonverbal acts demonstrate that cues cluster into listener behaviors and body movement or speaker acts and that the same subjects employ different patterns across task situations.

Journal

Annals of the International Communication AssociationTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 1980

References