Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Spheres of Argument: 30 Years of Influence

Spheres of Argument: 30 Years of Influence ARGUMENTATION AND ADVOCACY 48 (Spring 2012): 195-197 THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN FORENSIC ASSOCIATION ARGU SPHERES OF ARGUMENT: 30 YEARS OF INFLUENCE Robert C. Rowland, Guest Editor Thirty years ago in the Spring 1982 issue, The Journal of the American Forensic Association (now Argumentation and Advocacy), published a "Review Symposium on Argument Fields." The special issue, which was edited by Charles Arthur Willard, included essays by a number of leading scholars in argumentation including: David Zarefsky, Joseph Wenzel, Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar (one of the first joumal essays by a brand new assistant professor who had yet to complete his Ph.D.), Robert Rowland, and an essay by G. Thomas Goodnight, which at first glance seemed to be out of place. Unlike the others, Goodnight's essay focused on "spheres," not "fields," of argument. Thirty years later field theory is no longer a core topic of debate within argumentation studies, but the situation is very different in relation to spheres of argument. The study of the public, personal, and technical spheres of argument that Goodnight inaugurated with his groundbreaking essay remains vibrant today. It is not too strong to say that all of the many scholars, using a variety of approaches, who http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Argumentation and Advocacy Taylor & Francis

Spheres of Argument: 30 Years of Influence

Rowland, Robert C.
Argumentation and Advocacy , Volume 48 (4): 3 – Mar 1, 2012
Download PDF

Spheres of Argument: 30 Years of Influence

Abstract

ARGUMENTATION AND ADVOCACY 48 (Spring 2012): 195-197 THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN FORENSIC ASSOCIATION ARGU SPHERES OF ARGUMENT: 30 YEARS OF INFLUENCE Robert C. Rowland, Guest Editor Thirty years ago in the Spring 1982 issue, The Journal of the American Forensic Association (now Argumentation and Advocacy), published a "Review Symposium on Argument Fields." The special issue, which was edited by Charles Arthur Willard, included essays by a number of leading scholars in argumentation...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/spheres-of-argument-30-years-of-influence-ipNbXmBodO
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2012 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2576-8476
eISSN
1051-1431
DOI
10.1080/00028533.2012.11821770
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ARGUMENTATION AND ADVOCACY 48 (Spring 2012): 195-197 THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN FORENSIC ASSOCIATION ARGU SPHERES OF ARGUMENT: 30 YEARS OF INFLUENCE Robert C. Rowland, Guest Editor Thirty years ago in the Spring 1982 issue, The Journal of the American Forensic Association (now Argumentation and Advocacy), published a "Review Symposium on Argument Fields." The special issue, which was edited by Charles Arthur Willard, included essays by a number of leading scholars in argumentation including: David Zarefsky, Joseph Wenzel, Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar (one of the first joumal essays by a brand new assistant professor who had yet to complete his Ph.D.), Robert Rowland, and an essay by G. Thomas Goodnight, which at first glance seemed to be out of place. Unlike the others, Goodnight's essay focused on "spheres," not "fields," of argument. Thirty years later field theory is no longer a core topic of debate within argumentation studies, but the situation is very different in relation to spheres of argument. The study of the public, personal, and technical spheres of argument that Goodnight inaugurated with his groundbreaking essay remains vibrant today. It is not too strong to say that all of the many scholars, using a variety of approaches, who

Journal

Argumentation and Advocacy – Taylor & Francis

Published: Mar 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.