Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Student resistance to active learning: do instructors (mostly) get it wrong?

Student resistance to active learning: do instructors (mostly) get it wrong? Adopting evidence-based teaching practices, such as active learning, has proven to increase student learning, engagement, and interest in STEM and subsequently, the number and diversity of STEM graduates. Despite these compelling findings, the translation of educational research to classrooms has been slow, in part due to instructors’ concerns about student resistance. To better understand STEM instructors’ and students’ attitudes and behaviours regarding active learning, we administered surveys to instructors and their students and conducted classroom observations. The instructor survey measured their attitudes towards & use of active learning, strategies used to reduce student resistance, and perceptions of student behaviour. The corresponding student survey asked students to evaluate their instructors’ teaching practices, as well as students’ own attitudes and behaviours during class that day. Classroom observations supplemented these metrics. Analyses of matched survey datasets (n = 27, n = 758) and observations (n = 13) reveal a disconnect between instructor perceptions of their students’ responses to active learning and students’ self-reported attitudes and behaviours, where instructors overestimate student resistance. In contrast, students report they see value in the activities, enjoy them, and even plan to highly evaluate the course and instructor. Overall, these results suggest that instructors’ fears about adopting these teaching practices are largely erroneous. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australasian Journal of Engineering Education Taylor & Francis

Student resistance to active learning: do instructors (mostly) get it wrong?

Download PDF

Student resistance to active learning: do instructors (mostly) get it wrong?

Abstract

Adopting evidence-based teaching practices, such as active learning, has proven to increase student learning, engagement, and interest in STEM and subsequently, the number and diversity of STEM graduates. Despite these compelling findings, the translation of educational research to classrooms has been slow, in part due to instructors’ concerns about student resistance. To better understand STEM instructors’ and students’ attitudes and behaviours regarding active learning,...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/student-resistance-to-active-learning-do-instructors-mostly-get-it-8KST2FIro3
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© Engineers Australia
ISSN
1325-4340
eISSN
2205-4952
DOI
10.1080/22054952.2020.1861771
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Adopting evidence-based teaching practices, such as active learning, has proven to increase student learning, engagement, and interest in STEM and subsequently, the number and diversity of STEM graduates. Despite these compelling findings, the translation of educational research to classrooms has been slow, in part due to instructors’ concerns about student resistance. To better understand STEM instructors’ and students’ attitudes and behaviours regarding active learning, we administered surveys to instructors and their students and conducted classroom observations. The instructor survey measured their attitudes towards & use of active learning, strategies used to reduce student resistance, and perceptions of student behaviour. The corresponding student survey asked students to evaluate their instructors’ teaching practices, as well as students’ own attitudes and behaviours during class that day. Classroom observations supplemented these metrics. Analyses of matched survey datasets (n = 27, n = 758) and observations (n = 13) reveal a disconnect between instructor perceptions of their students’ responses to active learning and students’ self-reported attitudes and behaviours, where instructors overestimate student resistance. In contrast, students report they see value in the activities, enjoy them, and even plan to highly evaluate the course and instructor. Overall, these results suggest that instructors’ fears about adopting these teaching practices are largely erroneous.

Journal

Australasian Journal of Engineering Education – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jul 2, 2020

Keywords: Active learning; higher education; instructional change; adoption

References

  • Enhancing Self-directed Learning through Educational Technology: When Students Resist the Change
  • Students’ Resistance in the Classroom
  • Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom
  • Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in Us Engineering Departments
  • The Icap Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes
  • Effects of Active Learning Classrooms on Student Learning: A Two-year Empirical Investigation on Student Perceptions and Academic Performance
  • The Philosophical and Pedagogical Underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education
  • Using Expectancy Value Theory as A Framework to Reduce Student Resistance to Active Learning: A Proof of Concept
  • How Faculty Learn about and Implement Research-based Instructional Strategies: The Case of Peer Instruction
  • Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices
  • Measuring Actual Learning versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom
  • Active Learning: An Introduction
  • Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Strategies for Instructors
  • Factors that Influence Faculty Motivation of Effective Teaching Practices in Engineering
  • Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics
  • Estimates of Use of Research-based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses
  • Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Development and Validation of a Measure
  • Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology
  • The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education
  • Barriers to the Use of Research-based Instructional Strategies: The Influence of Both Individual and Situational Characteristics
  • Findings from Classroom Observations of 58 Math and Science Faculty
  • Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education
  • Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory
  • Coping with Student Resistance to Critical Thinking: What the Psychotherapy Literature Can Tell Us
  • Motivating First-year University Students by Interdisciplinary Study Projects
  • Activating Learning in Engineering Education Using Ict and the Concept of ‘Flipping the Classroom’
  • Student Perceptions of Active Learning
  • Student Perceptions of Active Learning in a Large Cross-disciplinary Classroom
  • A Comparison of Professional-level Faculty and Student Perceptions of Active Learning: Its Current Use, Effectiveness, and Barriers
  • Engineering Education—is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer
  • Students’ Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning
  • The Variation of Nontraditional Teaching Methods across 17 Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms
  • The Flipped Classroom: For Active, Effective and Increased Learning – Especially for Low Achievers
  • Perceptions of Active Learning between Faculty and Undergraduates: Differing Views among Departments
  • Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
  • Use of Research-based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses
  • Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases
  • “What if Students Revolt?”—considering Student Resistance: Origins, Options, and Opportunities for Investigation
  • Development of an Observation Protocol to Study Undergraduate Engineering Student Resistance to Active Learning
  • Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐based Practices
  • Is Active Learning like Broccoli? Student Perceptions of Active Learning in Large Lecture Classes
  • Anatomy of Stem Teaching in North American Universities
  • Evaluating Evidence for Conceptually Related Constructs Using Bivariate Correlations
  • Strategies to Mitigate Student Resistance to Active Learning