Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Student supervision: Criteria and methods of evaluation

Student supervision: Criteria and methods of evaluation STUI~T SUPERVISION: CRITERIA AND METHODS 0E EVALUATION Alma E o Hartshorn. One of the most exacting tasks required of a supervisor is that of evaluating the work of the student. It is a responsibility to the school of training which is implied when one accepts the role of student supervisor, and is important on that score alone. But its importance is not limited to the school, which needs it to assess the student's progress and his ultimate suitability for the profession of social work; the process of evaluation~and the way in which it is handled with the s~udent himself has a most important part to play in his dev~ o~eut as ~ professional person. It is for this reason, of course, that schools of social work ask the supervisor to discuss his report with the student. In so doirg they recognise the value to the student of hearing from the supervisor what he thinks of the student's work, and whether he considers that it compares satisfactorily with that oi other students at the same stsge in training. It will be convenient to consider the present topic in relation to the following questions :- (1) What is meant by evs/uation, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Social Work Taylor & Francis

Student supervision: Criteria and methods of evaluation

Hartshorn, Alma E.
Australian Journal of Social Work , Volume 7 (2): 13 – Jan 1, 1954
Download PDF

Student supervision: Criteria and methods of evaluation

Abstract

STUI~T SUPERVISION: CRITERIA AND METHODS 0E EVALUATION Alma E o Hartshorn. One of the most exacting tasks required of a supervisor is that of evaluating the work of the student. It is a responsibility to the school of training which is implied when one accepts the role of student supervisor, and is important on that score alone. But its importance is not limited to the school, which needs it to assess the student's progress and his ultimate suitability for the profession of social work;...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/student-supervision-criteria-and-methods-of-evaluation-SZnOh5FVkM
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Association of Australasian Palaeontologists
ISSN
0004-9565
DOI
10.1080/03124075408656126
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

STUI~T SUPERVISION: CRITERIA AND METHODS 0E EVALUATION Alma E o Hartshorn. One of the most exacting tasks required of a supervisor is that of evaluating the work of the student. It is a responsibility to the school of training which is implied when one accepts the role of student supervisor, and is important on that score alone. But its importance is not limited to the school, which needs it to assess the student's progress and his ultimate suitability for the profession of social work; the process of evaluation~and the way in which it is handled with the s~udent himself has a most important part to play in his dev~ o~eut as ~ professional person. It is for this reason, of course, that schools of social work ask the supervisor to discuss his report with the student. In so doirg they recognise the value to the student of hearing from the supervisor what he thinks of the student's work, and whether he considers that it compares satisfactorily with that oi other students at the same stsge in training. It will be convenient to consider the present topic in relation to the following questions :- (1) What is meant by evs/uation,

Journal

Australian Journal of Social Work – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1954

There are no references for this article.