Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

SUBALTERNITY AND AFFECT

SUBALTERNITY AND AFFECT A N G E L A K I j o u r n a l o f th e th e o r e t ic a l h u m a n i ti e s v o lu m e 6 n u m b e r 1 ap r il 2 00 1 his special issue of Angelaki arises in part Tfrom a preoccupation with the culturalisa- tion of the concept of hegemony, a concept that is, in its way, something like ÒhegemonicÓ within cultural criticism and theory. Our preoccupation with the concept, or rather with its extension and culturalisation, soon manifested itself as a dissat- isfaction, though perhaps (as some of the essays EDITORIAL in this collection also indicate) it continues to be indispensable, if not always in the ways that one INTRODUC TIO N tends to assume. The prevalence of the concept of hegemony coincides with an increasingly unreflexive cultur- jon beasley-murray alism in mainstream cultural studies; indeed, it coincides with cultural studies becoming main- alber to moreiras stream, as its assumptions and its terminology come to constitute Òwhat goes without sayingÓ in much of academia Ð and many places beyond. SU BALTERN ITY http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities Taylor & Francis

SUBALTERNITY AND AFFECT

4 pages

SUBALTERNITY AND AFFECT

Abstract

A N G E L A K I j o u r n a l o f th e th e o r e t ic a l h u m a n i ti e s v o lu m e 6 n u m b e r 1 ap r il 2 00 1 his special issue of Angelaki arises in part Tfrom a preoccupation with the culturalisa- tion of the concept of hegemony, a concept that is, in its way, something like ÒhegemonicÓ within cultural criticism and theory. Our preoccupation with the concept, or rather with its extension and culturalisation, soon manifested itself as a dissat- isfaction, though...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/subalternity-and-affect-k9Gvbo2TDG
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1469-2899
eISSN
0969-725X
DOI
10.1080/09697250120056729
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A N G E L A K I j o u r n a l o f th e th e o r e t ic a l h u m a n i ti e s v o lu m e 6 n u m b e r 1 ap r il 2 00 1 his special issue of Angelaki arises in part Tfrom a preoccupation with the culturalisa- tion of the concept of hegemony, a concept that is, in its way, something like ÒhegemonicÓ within cultural criticism and theory. Our preoccupation with the concept, or rather with its extension and culturalisation, soon manifested itself as a dissat- isfaction, though perhaps (as some of the essays EDITORIAL in this collection also indicate) it continues to be indispensable, if not always in the ways that one INTRODUC TIO N tends to assume. The prevalence of the concept of hegemony coincides with an increasingly unreflexive cultur- jon beasley-murray alism in mainstream cultural studies; indeed, it coincides with cultural studies becoming main- alber to moreiras stream, as its assumptions and its terminology come to constitute Òwhat goes without sayingÓ in much of academia Ð and many places beyond. SU BALTERN ITY

Journal

Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical HumanitiesTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.